Search for: "US v. Taylor" Results 981 - 1000 of 2,463
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Jun 2008, 12:05 pm
Taylor     Northern District of Ohio at Cleveland 08a0340n.06 USA v. [read post]
23 Feb 2015, 2:55 am
 Birgit steps into the debate that that these filings have triggered, focusing on what Taylor’s obsessive filing entails in terms of freedom of expression.* Jurisdiction in online Community trade mark infringement cases: what's the story? [read post]
17 Jul 2013, 4:47 pm by Steve Sady
” In Taylor, the Court recognized that some statutes had alternative crimes within the same statute. [read post]
26 Aug 2022, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
But an analysis shows fewer women are using federal funds to cover childcare expenses this election cycle. [read post]
27 Feb 2022, 8:45 pm
v=o0OIfdlwZHwVideo Credit: Sean Evans, @evvo1991https://www.backtothemovies.com/ [read post]
17 Nov 2014, 6:00 am by Karen Tani
Over at JOTWELL, Pat Gutridge (University of Miami School of Law) has shined a spotlight on a student Note by Daniel Taylor Young, titled, "How Do You Measure a Constitutional Moment? [read post]
14 Mar 2024, 6:56 am by centerforartlaw
However, the use of parody in the context of commercial products, such as the “Satan Shoes,” which will be discussed in further detail later, raises questions about the limits of fair use and the potential for trademark infringement.[14] In another drop, MSCHF created the Global Supply Chain Telephone Handbag that combines elements from famous luxury brands like Birkin, Celine, Dior, and Balenciaga. [read post]
30 Sep 2013, 4:50 am
The CART team used software called Forensic Tool Kit, or FTK, to process that hard drive. [read post]
11 Jun 2018, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Commissioners for HMRC v Taylor Clark Leisure Plc (Scotland), heard 11 Apr 2018. [read post]
13 May 2009, 3:03 am
The most important opinion generated during the case is here: United States v. [read post]
19 Jun 2012, 9:00 am
  First, an infringement suit ended in an award of $5.8 million in damages for infringement of egg pasteurization techniques in the case of Michael Foods, Inc. v. [read post]