Search for: "V D" Results 981 - 1000 of 76,322
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 May 2009, 2:52 am
R (O'Connor) v HM Coroner for the District of Avon (Visser intervening) [2009] EWHC 854 (Admin); [2009] WLR(D); [2009] WLR (D) 150 “The test for a verdict of unlawful killing was not exclusively objective, it being necessary to find at least the mental element necessary for a criminal conviction of assault; and insanity, if properly raised [...] [read post]
6 Mar 2012, 3:11 am by sally
O’Brien v Ministry of Justice (Case C-393/10); [2012] WLR (D) 58 “It was for the member states to define the concept of ‘workers who have an employment contract or an employment relationship’ within the meaning of clause 2.1 of the Framework Agreement on part-time work, provided that this did not lead to arbitrary exclusion from protection offered by Directive 97/81/EC.” WLR Daily, 1st March 2012 Source: www.iclr.co.uk [read post]
10 Dec 2009, 9:32 am
Regina v IB Â [2009] EWCA Crim 2575; [2009] WLR (D) 357 "A 'cartel offence' under s 188 of the Enterprise Act 2002 was not a 'national competition law' within the meaning of Council Regulation (EC) No 1/2003, so that a Crown Court had jurisdiction to try a prosecution for such an offence although it was not [...] [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 3:56 am by sally
R (Tilianu) v Social Fund Inspector and another [2010] EWHC 213 (Admin); [2010] WLR (D) 54 “Although art 7(3)(b)-(d) of Council Directive 2004/38/EC of 29 April 2004 on the right of citizens of the Union and their family members to move and reside freely within the territory of the member states (OJ 2004 L158, p 77), applied to formerly employed workers, it did not apply to those who had been self employed. [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 12:13 pm
  The individual guilty of lynching isn't necessarily the race you might think she'd be.Needless to say, the offense of "lynching" in California in 2011 is somewhat different than its historical analogues. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 3:45 am by sally
Koelzsch v État du Grand-Duché de Luxembourg (Case C-29/10); [2011] WLR (D) 93 “Where an employee carries out activities in more than one contracting state the country in which the employee ‘habitually carries out his work in performance of the contract’, within the meaning of article 6(2)(a) of the Rome Convention on the law applicable to contractual obligations, was that in which or from which, in the light of all the factors which characterised… [read post]