Search for: "Wagner v. Wagner"
Results 981 - 1000
of 1,135
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Mar 2010, 3:57 am
BAURKOT, ESQ., Non-Party-Appellants, DAYANARA RODRIGUEZ, an infant by her , Plaintiffs, v. [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 7:29 pm
Wagner National Labor and Employment Law Moot Court Competition. [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 3:15 am
”The Court of Appeals cited Gavigan v McCoy, 37 NY2d 548, Niebling v Wagner, 12 NY2d 314, and Mandle v Brown, 4 AD2d 283, affirmed 5 NY2d 51, as cases demonstrating the proposition that an employee cannot achieve a higher grade or salary by being assigned or engaging in out-of-title work “because this would violate the fundamental civil service tenet of advancement through competitive examination. [read post]
18 Feb 2010, 10:48 am
” Wagner v. [read post]
12 Feb 2010, 8:42 am
Archuleta v. [read post]
2 Feb 2010, 7:28 am
Armond, 866 So. 2d 1092, 1100-01 (Miss. 2004) (label change); Wagner v. [read post]
2 Feb 2010, 3:17 am
In Wagner Divs, P.C. v Gargano 01/20/2010 ; 2010 NYSlipOp 30156(U) Justice Gische decides: a. [read post]
29 Jan 2010, 1:00 pm
The second issue addresses whether an undocumented alien employee may recover under the ADEA, in light of the Supreme Courts holding in Hoffman Plastic Compounds, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Jan 2010, 1:53 am
Last week, in Citizens United v. [read post]
12 Jan 2010, 5:00 am
This is, after all, the Nuvaring Cycle, not Wagner's Ring Cycle. [read post]
11 Jan 2010, 7:00 am
Wagner(1982) 138 Cal.App.3d 473, 481 (jury confusion). [read post]
25 Dec 2009, 6:37 pm
Clinical Microbiology and Infection Jan. 2010 V.16 N.1 p.16-23 F. [read post]
24 Dec 2009, 8:02 pm
The CAFC cited Georgia-Pacific:To support his royalty calculation, Wagner adjusted the baseline royalty rate of ($96) using the factors set out in Georgia-Pacific Corp. v. [read post]
24 Dec 2009, 6:20 am
Grace - Yes Stender, Linda - Yes Thompson, Samuel D. - Yes Tucker, Cleopatra G. - Yes Vainieri Huttle, Valerie - Yes Van Pelt, Daniel M. - Yes Vandervalk, Charlotte - Yes Vas, Joseph - Not Voting Voss, Joan M. - Yes Wagner, Connie - Yes Watson Coleman, Bonnie - Yes Webber, Jay - Yes Wisniewski, John S. - Yes Wolfe, David W. - Yes ......... [read post]
22 Dec 2009, 8:57 pm
i4i v. [read post]
22 Dec 2009, 3:26 am
"It was error to dismiss the first cause of action merely because plaintiff is not entitled to the declaration he seeks (see Lanza v Wagner, 11 NY2d 317, 334 [1962], cert denied 371 US 901 [1962]); the proper course is to declare in favor of defendants (see Holliswood Care Ctr. v Whalen, 58 NY2d 1001, 1004 [1983]; Mongelli v Sharp, 140 AD2d 273 [1988]). [read post]
18 Dec 2009, 11:27 am
Hendrow v. [read post]
11 Dec 2009, 5:07 am
United States v. [read post]
7 Dec 2009, 3:00 am
B-Roc Reps., Inc (Chicago IP Litigation Blog) Rothschild, Prof Gertrude Neumark - More settlements in and out of court for litigious LED professor (Green Patent Blog) SP Techs - N D Illinois: Inventor not allowed to intervene in patent dispute: SP Techs v Garmin Int’l (Chicago Intellectual Property Law Blog) US Copyright – Lawsuits and strategic steps Warner Music – Warner Music and Sony drop XM radio suit (IPKat) US Trademarks Joe Dreitler expounds on… [read post]
