Search for: "Powers v. Powers" Results 9981 - 10000 of 55,711
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Feb 2021, 2:30 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Roberts: doctrinal narrative that producer is really powerful. [read post]
19 Feb 2021, 10:39 am by Tia Sewell
So far, more than 50 countries have ordered doses of the Sputnik V vaccine. [read post]
19 Feb 2021, 9:57 am by Rebecca Jeschke
” For the full complaint in Just Futures v DHS:https://www.eff.org/document/mediajustice-v-dhs-covid-19-foia-complaint Just Futures Law (JFL) is a women-of-color led transformative immigration law project rooted in movement lawyering. [read post]
19 Feb 2021, 8:38 am by Cecillia Wang
As attorney general, Garland will have the power to set the stage for criminal legal reform over the next four years, both as our nation’s top federal prosecutor and, through his Civil Rights Division, by holding the police accountable around the country. [read post]
19 Feb 2021, 4:30 am by Public Employment Law Press
  Citing Consolidated Edison Co. of New York v Department of Environmental Conservation, 71 NY2d 186, the Court said that administrative agencies have "all the powers expressly delegated to [them] by the Legislature" and are "permitted to adopt regulations that go beyond the text of [their] enabling legislation, so long as those regulations are consistent with the statutory language and underlying purpose. [read post]
19 Feb 2021, 1:46 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
A risk of collision between two powered vessels can arise in three different ways and the Collision Regulations establish rules for each: overtaking vessels; vessels approaching each other head-on; and vessels crossing so as to involve risk of collision. [read post]
19 Feb 2021, 1:36 am by CMS
  On 15 December 2020, the Supreme Court heard the parties’ submissions in the case of General Dynamics United Kingdom Limited v State of Libya. [read post]
18 Feb 2021, 7:52 pm by Adeline Chong
The High Court’s recent decision in Allenger v Pelletier [2020] SGHC 279, issued barely a year after the Court of Appeal’s decision in Bi Xiaoqiong v China Medical Technologies [2019] 2 SLR 595; [2019] SGCA 50 (see previous post here) qualifies the latter, confounding Singapore’s position on this complex issue even further. [read post]
18 Feb 2021, 6:12 pm by Sarah Baumgartel
On February 17, 2021, the district court issued a new order in the continuing saga of United States v. [read post]
18 Feb 2021, 12:37 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Lunney: are these recent v. historical? [read post]