Search for: "mark"
Results 9981 - 10000
of 136,219
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jun 2015, 3:05 am
The dissimilarity of the marks? [read post]
26 Mar 2018, 8:22 am
Since the involved marks differ only by the addition of the letter "Y," "which is unlikely to affect the pronunciation," the Board deemed the marks to be similar in sight, sound, and commercial impression.Respondent argued that petitioner's mark is weak, pointing to various websites that use the term“MOSAIC” for similar services and to third-party registrations for that term. [read post]
29 May 2013, 11:22 am
It asserts that, as a result of its use of the Dan's Comp marks, the marks have developed significant goodwill in the market. [read post]
17 Jan 2025, 3:53 am
Larkin) [Section 2(d) refusal of the mark LOFTIWATER for "Water beverages" in view of the registered mark LOFTY for, inter alia, coffee, tea, fruit juices and fruit juice-based drinks.] [read post]
21 Jun 2024, 3:59 am
"despite: (1) the marks being highly similar, which weighs heavily against finding a likelihood of confusion; and (2) Opposer’s IFIT mark being commercially strong. [read post]
27 Aug 2020, 3:48 am
In re Hop Daddy LLC, Serial No. 88175921 (August 24,2020) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Mark Lebow).The Board keenly observed that marks are different in appearance and sound, "but equivalency in meaning or connotation can outweigh the differences in marks. [read post]
5 Mar 2013, 3:15 am
Thus customers are likely to find rice that is marked "Valencia" to be more desirable than other rice products, and the designation would be material to their purchasing decisions.Pan American urged the Board to look at the mark as a whole, but the Board found nothing in the mark that contradicted the impression that VALENCIA denotes the type of rice. [read post]
31 Oct 2023, 4:07 am
Serrala Group GmbH, Opposition No. 91250244 [Opposition to registration of the mark shown below, for, inter alia, computer programs and software for business finance and accountancy; application software for cloud computing in the field of business finance and accountancy; and downloadable software in the field of finance and accountancy," in view of the registered mark FS for banking services and the common law mark FS for computer software designed to assist in… [read post]
9 Jun 2015, 2:45 am
Are the marks similar? [read post]
13 Mar 2024, 4:18 am
Focusing on the cited standard character mark, it found the marks to be confusingly similar. [read post]
27 Jun 2017, 6:45 am
We will have to wait for another application to see whether the boundaries of trade mark law can be pushed a step further by adding hand gestures to the category of unusual marks, next to smells, colors or sounds. [read post]
1 Feb 2016, 3:21 am
[Section 2(d) refusals to register the mark ECLIPSE for various goods relating to motion pictures and entertainment, in classes 9, 14, 18, 24, and 25, in view of, respectively, several class 9 registrations for the identical mark, a registration of the identical mark for watches in class 14, three registration in class 18 for ECLIPSE, ECLIPZE, and ECLIPS & Design, a class 24 registration of ECLIPSE for curtains, and a class 25 registration of the identical… [read post]
15 May 2019, 3:22 am
Of course, if deceptive, the applied-for mark would be unregistrable. [read post]
20 Apr 2022, 3:49 am
The Board found the proposed mark to be identical to registrant's word mark and highly similar to its word-plus-design mark. [read post]
15 Apr 2015, 7:43 am
The USPTO refused regsitration of the mark SUNRISE for guitar picks, finding the mark likely to cause confusion with the registered mark PUKANA LA & Design for guitars (shown below). [read post]
19 Apr 2013, 5:25 am
The mark GREEN SEAL must stand on its own. [read post]
24 Apr 2020, 7:07 am
Its adversary owns a registration for the mark THERAPY TREE for "Speech, occupational and physical therapy. [read post]
22 May 2025, 6:10 am
The CAFC vacated and remanded the Board's decision [pdf here] dismissing an opposition to registration of the mark SFERA in the form shown below, for perfumery and cosmetics (Class 3), leather handbags and wallets (Class 18), and clothing (Class 25), in view of the registered mark SFERRA for table linen, bed sheets, lap robes, bath towels, and the like (Class 24). [read post]
3 Sep 2020, 3:25 am
[Section 2(d) refusal of SUGAR BOMBS for "bath bombs" in view of the registered mark SUGARBOMB for "cosmetics. [read post]
14 Dec 2021, 2:22 pm
The Board cancelled the mark on the basis that Sunbio was not the owner of the BF-7 mark at the time of Sunbio’s application for registration because it had not used the mark. [read post]
