Search for: "AC v. State"
Results 1001 - 1020
of 1,882
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jan 2013, 4:50 am
Unlike, say, Campbell v MGN Ltd [2004] AC 457, [2004] UKHL 22 (6 May 2004), this is not a case of Cowen on intensely private and personal time, seeking private help for very personal demons. [read post]
24 Jan 2013, 4:45 pm
Monk [1992] AC 478) to reach the higher Courts. [read post]
24 Jan 2013, 4:45 pm
Monk [1992] AC 478) to reach the higher Courts. [read post]
13 Jan 2013, 5:14 am
Nature of Exemplary Damages and the Recommendation Exemplary damages are a special category of damages which is designed to punish the defendant and to vindicate the strength of the law (see Rookes v Barnard [1964] AC 1129 at 1221). [read post]
8 Jan 2013, 7:30 pm
v What’s law got to do with it? [read post]
8 Jan 2013, 9:39 am
But nonetheless, excellent is how we view Solomon v. [read post]
28 Nov 2012, 5:09 am
In the recent case of Stancil v. [read post]
27 Nov 2012, 8:43 am
As all the fine Private International Law practitioners reading this post will know, forum non conveniens requires the Court’s consideration of the test set out by Lord Goff of Chieveley in Spiliada Maritime Corp v Cansulex Ltd [1987] AC 460. [read post]
24 Nov 2012, 12:38 pm
As I noted in “Confusion Over Causation in Texas” (Aug. 27, 2011), the Texas Supreme Court managed to confuse general and specific causation concepts in its decision in Merck & Co. v. [read post]
20 Nov 2012, 10:25 am
The House of Lords in Reynolds v Times Newspapers Ltd [2001] 2 AC 127 explained why English law should adopt a different approach. [read post]
19 Nov 2012, 12:08 pm
The decision in DF by AC v. [read post]
7 Nov 2012, 3:02 pm
In West Washington Properties v. [read post]
7 Nov 2012, 3:54 am
Compiled from online public domain resources, provided for your review/use is this week's update of key industry news, views, and events highlighting key electronic discovery related stories, developments, and announcements.For a live daily view of industry news, click here for the Vendor Clips Live News Feed.Follow @InfoGovernanceeDiscovery News Content and ConsiderationsCourt Orders Retention of Outside Vendor to Collect Responsive Documents, Investigate Possible Spoliation –… [read post]
2 Nov 2012, 5:00 am
See also Coffin v. [read post]
31 Oct 2012, 9:49 am
These were most famously set out by Lord Bingham in by the House of Lords in R (Amin) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2004] 1 AC HL [at 31]: The purposes of such an investigation are clear: to ensure so far as possible that the full facts are brought to light; that culpable and discreditable conduct is exposed and brought to public notice; that suspicion of deliberate wrongdoing (if justified) is allayed; that dangerous practices and… [read post]
31 Oct 2012, 4:39 am
Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs and another (Appellants) v Yunus Rahmatullah (Respondent) The Supreme Court has ruled that the law of habeas corpus should not be used to order the US to return a Pakistani national held in US custody to the UK. [read post]
29 Oct 2012, 5:07 pm
Sir Robin Jacob (who retired from the Court of Appeal last year but was making one of his occasional reappearances) in giving the leading judgment noted Lord Nicholls in Mercedes Benz v Leiduck [1996] AC 284, p.308: “The court may grant an injunction against a party properly before it where this is required to avoid injustice […] The court habitually grants injunctions in respect of certain types of conduct. [read post]
23 Oct 2012, 3:06 am
In Ace European Ltd & 5 ors v (1) Howden Group (2) Howden North America Inc (formerly Howden Buffalo Inc) [2012] EWHC 2427 (Comm), Mr Justice Field upheld his prior order granting permission to the claimant insurers (the Claimants), to serve proceedings seeking declaratory relief, out of the jurisdiction.The Claimants were excess public and products liability insurers of the first Defendant and its subsidiary companies from 1995 to 2002. [read post]
22 Oct 2012, 8:20 am
He accepts that if regulations are laid his case might not fall within them but claims to have standing under the new approach to Scottish public law title and interest set out in AXA General Insurance Ltd v HM Advocate [2011] UKSC 46, [2012] 1 AC 868, 2011 SLT 106. [read post]
