Search for: "American Express Co. v. United States" Results 1001 - 1020 of 1,518
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Apr 2010, 9:13 pm
 But also because I was jarred by the juxtaposition of his dissent in Johnson with his decision to join the 8-1 majority in yesterday's ruling in United States v. [read post]
7 Jul 2010, 11:38 am
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit is Grosz v. [read post]
6 Oct 2009, 1:34 pm
That dispute ultimately reached the Supreme Court, in the case of New York Times Co. et al. v. [read post]
4 Aug 2021, 2:30 pm by Jason Rantanen
Notably, their application has been denied by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO), the United Kingdom Intellectual Property Office (UKIPO), and the European Patent Office (EPO). [read post]
5 Apr 2010, 3:32 pm by Joe Mullin
They are paid by the United States of America to help protect and make America strong by protecting American inventors and protecting American invention. [read post]
24 Jul 2008, 1:05 am
The only difference discoverable between the two cases is, that each representative of the United States will be elected by five or six thousand citizens; whilst in the individual States, the election of a representative is left to about as many hundreds. [read post]
22 Feb 2017, 9:06 am by Schachtman
The Noerr-Pennington Doctrine of Immunity One of the first agenda items for the first United States Congress was the drafting of a “Bill of Rights” to be submitted to the individual States for ratification. [read post]
17 Apr 2016, 3:57 pm
 Expressing frustration at two examples - Apple v Kodak and Broadcom v Qualcomm. [read post]
14 Jun 2015, 2:00 pm by Peter Margulies
United States, rests on a narrow, grudging reading of Congress’s war powers. [read post]
27 Jan 2013, 4:54 pm by Lisa A. Mazzie
  The argument about unit cohesion is also one that had long been made against allowing gays—and African Americans before them—to serve in the military. [read post]
25 Nov 2009, 3:00 am
(IPKat) Maximising IP and intangible assets: new report (IP finance) (Innovationpartners) Protecting developing countries through the Trips Agreement: What is the real state of play? [read post]
14 Jan 2011, 10:07 am by Christa Culver
United StatesDocket: 10-341Issue(s): (1) Whether the Federal Circuit erred by creating a defense to breach of the implied contractual duties under the sovereign acts doctrine that is at odds with the two-part test established by this Court in United States v. [read post]