Search for: "American Standard Companies, Inc." Results 1001 - 1020 of 2,903
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Feb 2017, 12:04 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Boston University Journal of Science and Technology Law Symposium Sorry, guys, I did not follow the patent panels.Panel III: Trademarks Rebecca Tushnet, Fixing Incontestability: The Next FrontierIncontestability is a nearly unique feature of American trademark law, with a unique American implementation. [read post]
17 Feb 2017, 4:09 am by Jon Hyman
Here’s what I read this week: Discrimination Happy Valentine’s Day: Tales of Harassment Horror at Work — via Evil HR Lady, Suzanne Lucas, at Inc. [read post]
17 Feb 2017, 4:09 am by Jon Hyman
Here’s what I read this week: Discrimination Happy Valentine’s Day: Tales of Harassment Horror at Work — via Evil HR Lady, Suzanne Lucas, at Inc. [read post]
16 Feb 2017, 6:28 am by Joy Waltemath
” There, she noted, the Board “restated its joint employer standard and reaffirmed its commitment to the standard articulated by the Third Circuit in NLRB v. [read post]
24 Jan 2017, 6:50 am by Ed. Microjuris.com Puerto Rico
While on the campaign trail last year, Trump proposed a lower tax rate, boasting that “no American company will pay more than 15% off their business income in taxes”. [read post]
14 Jan 2017, 8:41 am by Eric Goldman
” * NY Times: Europe Presses American Tech Companies to Tackle Hate Speech. [read post]
12 Jan 2017, 7:01 am by John Elwood
Amgen Inc., et al., 15-1039 and Amgen Inc. v. [read post]
9 Jan 2017, 4:07 pm by Kevin LaCroix
The Company cited “positive top-line results” in the study, yet reported an efficacy measure that failed to meet the standard set by other approved contraceptive patches. [read post]
30 Dec 2016, 2:00 pm by Amanda Pickens
December 7, 2016) (putative class action alleging tobacco company deceptively marketed their Natural American Spirit cigarettes as “natural” and “additive-free”). [read post]
28 Dec 2016, 6:11 pm by Schachtman
Armstrong World Indus., Inc., 928 F.2d 1366 (3d Cir. 1991). [read post]