Search for: "Battle v. State" Results 1001 - 1020 of 8,255
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Dec 2021, 9:10 am by NCC Staff
Jackson Women’s Health Organization that allowing state legislatures to create their own abortion regimes would enhance democracy and would allow the Supreme Court to be “scrupulously neutral” — returning abortion to the states would actually be antidemocratic, because gerrymandering at the state district level, sustained by the Supreme Court’s 2019 decision in Rucho v. [read post]
8 Dec 2021, 4:36 am by Scott Bomboy
In 1892, the Supreme Court upheld Reed’s ruling in United States v. [read post]
7 Dec 2021, 5:01 am by Russell Wheeler
Wisconsin Elections Commission, Dec. 4, 2020) and a request to block the certification of the state vote (Mueller v. [read post]
5 Dec 2021, 9:01 pm by Austin Sarat and Dennis Aftergut
” It was good enough for “separate but equal” segregation in many states up to the Court’s 1954 decision in Brown v. [read post]
2 Dec 2021, 10:35 am by Neil Schoenherr
” The Supreme Court heard arguments this week in the legal battle involving a Mississippi law that prohibits abortions after 15 weeks of pregnancy, which directly conflicts with Roe v. [read post]
30 Nov 2021, 2:10 pm by Ilya Somin
But if her suit meets a more fortunate fate, she may recuperate some of the financial costs incurred as she battles stage 3 cancer and tries to leave the state for retirement. [read post]
24 Nov 2021, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
The excellent questions raised show how fertile a field this is for scholars to till.A few years ago, David Congdon, now the Senior Editor at Kansas, told us it was a high priority of his to issue a book on United States v. [read post]
18 Nov 2021, 11:30 am by Mark Graber
Hubley Ashton and Maxwell Evarts, who argued United States v. [read post]
17 Nov 2021, 1:34 pm by NARF
 Learn more about the vacancy at: https://www.narf.org/contact-us/join-team/ State Courts Bulletin https://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/state/2021.html Grossman v. [read post]