Search for: "C. G., Matter of" Results 1001 - 1020 of 3,607
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 May 2007, 12:40 pm
`(g) The terms `joint inventor' and `coinventor' mean any 1 of the individuals who invented or discovered the subject matter of a joint invention. [read post]
13 Jan 2019, 11:30 pm by Guido Paola
According to the record of the telephone conversation on file, neither the main request nor any of auxiliary requests 1 to 5 fulfilled the requirements of Article 56 EPC "basically for the same reasons as set out in the summons to oral proceedings namely that the claimed subject-matter is essentially directed to purely non-technical subject-matter which cannot contribute to inventive step". [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 9:42 am by Deven Desai
” responses –Failures matter First, we failed repeatedly to wrap our minds around this paper. [read post]
26 Jan 2016, 9:53 pm
Black’s Law Dictionary defines an “objection” as follows: “The act of a party who objects to some matter or proceeding in the course of a trial, or an argument or reason urged by him in support of his contention that the matter or proceeding objected to is improper or illegal. [read post]
12 Jan 2007, 11:17 am
`(g) The terms `joint inventor' and `coinventor' mean any one of the individuals who invented or discovered the subject matter of a joint invention. [read post]
4 Jan 2012, 7:59 am by Sonya Hubbard
(Bloomberg’s report on the matter is here; the Wall Street Journal’s is here.) [read post]
27 May 2013, 6:20 am by Susan Brenner
As a result of the grievance and what I am assuming is an investigation, the Disciplinary Commission charged Usher with violating these Indiana Rules of Professional Conduct: 3.3(a)(1): Knowingly making a false statement of fact to a tribunal. 8.1(a): Knowingly making a false statement of material fact to the Disciplinary Commission in connection with a disciplinary matter. 8.1(b): Failure to disclose a fact necessary to correct a misapprehension known by the person to have arisen in a… [read post]
21 Feb 2022, 4:21 am by Peter Mahler
There is no record of her properly transferring her general partner status to Tump pursuant to Section 16 of the Agreement; instead, she purported to “resign as [g]eneral [p]artner and appoint Tump. . . as the successor [g]eneral [p]artner” under Section 19.7. [read post]
18 Dec 2015, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
G I V E N under my hand and the Privy Seal of the State in the City of Albany this twelfth day of December in the year two thousand fifteen.BY THE GOVERNORSecretary to the Governors/ [read post]
30 Aug 2021, 3:26 am
The patent thus is strong evidence that the matter is functional. [read post]
18 Aug 2023, 12:37 pm by Larry
Cases brought under the Enforce and Protect Act have their own standard of review in 19 USC 1517(g). [read post]
13 Sep 2019, 12:16 pm
Fifth- or Sixth-Offense OWI: Both fifth- and sixth-offense OWI charges are classified as Class G felonies. [read post]
12 Aug 2013, 3:17 pm by Linda A. Kerns
If the non-relocating parent timely objects, then the court will schedule an expedited full hearing on the matter (§5337(g)). [read post]
8 Dec 2014, 6:51 am
Perhaps this is the approach adopted by WIPO in its earliest days, when it gradually moved away from the one-right-per-subject-matter policy: the organisation must have recognised that preventing overlap was treating the symptoms rather than curing any ills. [read post]
4 Nov 2019, 7:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
** See Matter of Mondello v Beekman, 56 NY2d 513, affirmed on opinion below at 78 AD2d 824. [read post]
4 Nov 2019, 7:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
** See Matter of Mondello v Beekman, 56 NY2d 513, affirmed on opinion below at 78 AD2d 824. [read post]
10 Jan 2013, 7:40 am by Bexis
§1332(d)(11)(C)(i)).So all hope of federal jurisdiction for parens patriae actions is not lost. [read post]