Search for: "CO.1. Means" Results 1001 - 1020 of 16,768
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Apr 2015, 4:31 am by David DePaolo
Syracuse Supply Co. that a worker who was working on the installation and removal of a billboard advertisement was engaged in alteration of the "structure" within the meaning of Section 240(1).In contrast, the Court of Appeals found in Nicometi v. [read post]
6 Feb 2013, 9:50 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
The case of Metallizing Engineering Co. v. [read post]
19 Oct 2014, 9:23 am by Alfred Brophy
Manuscripts and review proposals should be submitted to either Professor Margaret Woo at m.woo@neu.edu or Dean Jeremy Paul at j.paul@neu.edu, the co-editors of the JLE. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 5:02 am by Deirdre Wheatley-Liss
 Not if you are a lawyer - to us "laches" means "too bad, you are out of time", as in, "that door is now locked". [read post]
19 Apr 2023, 11:12 am by Christopher G. Hill
In Faneuil, Inc. v. 3M Co., the Virginia Supreme Court considered a customer services subcontract between Faneuil and 3M relating to a toll collection contract 3M entered into with ERC. [read post]
4 Feb 2019, 6:04 am by John O'Sullivan
It is irrelevant whether the beneficiary is also a co-trustee of the trust provided the trust terms prevent the beneficiary as co-trustee from unilaterally ordering trust payments, and give her no more access to its assets than a beneficiary who is not also a trustee. [read post]
3 Jan 2024, 12:08 am by Adeline Chong
Guest post by Professor Yeo Tiong Min, SC (honoris causa), Yong Pung How Chair Professor of Law, Yong Pung How School of Law, Singapore Management University Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp (formerly known as Merck & Co, Inc) v Merck KGaA (formerly known as E Merck) [2021] 1 SLR 1102, [2021] SGCA 14 (“Merck”), noted previously, is a landmark case in Singapore private international law, being a decision of a full bench of the Court of Appeal setting out for the first… [read post]
12 Aug 2015, 11:46 am by Nicola Ai Ling Prall
The Employer advertised using the San Antonio Express (“Express-News”) for its Sunday newspaper advertisement requirement, 20 CFR 656.17(e)(1)(i)(B)(1). [read post]
12 Jul 2010, 11:00 pm
Does the end of convicting a business executive of a crime justify the means by which government prosecutors accomplish it? [read post]