Search for: "Commander Smith"
Results 1001 - 1020
of 1,091
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Mar 2010, 11:10 am
This is my second post in a planned series on why the good faith exception to the exclusionary rule does not apply when a police officer conducts a search that is lawful when it occurs that is later ruled unlawful before the conviction is final. [read post]
7 Mar 2023, 4:46 am
Hyunsu Yim and Josh Smith report for Reuters. [read post]
9 Jun 2024, 9:00 pm
“I am your retribution” –Donald TrumpOn April 25, 194 days before the November 5 presidential election, the Supreme Court heard Donald Trump’s argument that the “January 6” case being prosecuted by Special Prosecutor Jack Smith was barred by presidential immunity. [read post]
21 Apr 2015, 2:38 pm
In addition, Father failed to explain what he intended the child to do had she followed his command and entered the public men's room. [read post]
2 Jun 2022, 4:03 am
Cyber Command General Paul Nakasone. [read post]
23 Sep 2011, 12:08 pm
Smith & Nephew Richards Inc., 1996 WL 593780 (Tx. [read post]
8 Oct 2019, 5:54 am
This post summarizes published decisions from the Fourth Circuit of interest to state practitioners from September, 2019. [read post]
2 Nov 2022, 5:24 am
Signup to receive the Early Edition in your inbox here. [read post]
7 Jul 2024, 9:05 pm
Chief Justice Roberts recites the Special Counsel Jack Smith’s allegations but somehow fails to grasp their main meaning. [read post]
2 Aug 2019, 3:00 am
National/Federal Ex-McConnell Staffers Lobbied on Russian-Backed Kentucky Project Politico – Natasha Bertrand and Theodoric Meyer | Published: 7/31/2019 Two former top staffers to Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell have lobbied Congress and the Treasury Department on the development of a new Kentucky aluminum mill backed by the Russian aluminum giant Rusal, according to a new lobbying disclosure. [read post]
7 Feb 2018, 12:00 am
[Smith v Hager, 185 A.D.2d 612]Demoting an employee for sleeping on duty on two occasions, although a hearing officer found the employee’s supervisor had “condoned” such conduct and the hearing officer had recommended a suspension without pay for three weeks. [read post]
3 Aug 2018, 4:00 am
[Smith v Hager, 185 A.D.2d 612]Demoting an employee for sleeping on duty on two occasions, although a hearing officer found the employee’s supervisor had “condoned” such conduct and the hearing officer had recommended a suspension without pay for three weeks. [read post]
18 Apr 2010, 10:01 am
Courts can do that, and can balance competing commands (such as the First Amendment). [read post]
26 May 2023, 4:00 am
Connecticut – Consultant on New London Pier Project Fined for Ethics Violations – Again WSHU – Brian Scott-Smith | Published: 5/19/2023 The Connecticut Office of State Ethics fined Seabury Maritime $10,000 for violating the state’s lobbying law. [read post]
29 Jan 2012, 4:13 pm
Last July, after months of contentious negotiations, Goodell and DeMaurice Smith of the NFL Players Association signed an unpreceden [read post]
25 Nov 2008, 5:21 pm
Update:It was a rough prognosticaton week in Division I-A FBS football as we were only 28-13 in calling the winners and a poor 18-21-2 against the spread. [read post]
17 Aug 2020, 11:58 am
And it’s not because you know I have some better special command of what’s going on at oral argument. [read post]
22 Sep 2023, 4:00 am
Special counsel Jack Smith’s team said in a motion that such a “narrow, well-defined” order was necessary to preserve the integrity of the case and to avoid prejudicing potential jurors. [read post]
14 Jan 2021, 8:30 pm
National/Federal A Siege on the U.S. [read post]
24 Sep 2010, 3:08 pm
§ 1983 for failing to prevent another officer’s use of force when that force was used within a short period such that a reasonable officer in the same circumstance would not have had a realistic opportunity to intervene; (2) whether the commands “get on the ground, drop the gun” are sufficient to satisfy the warning required prior to the use of deadly force; and (3) whether a party’s self-serving testimony that contradicts his or her prior statement is… [read post]
