Search for: "Commission on Presidential Debates" Results 1001 - 1020 of 1,220
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Jan 2012, 12:47 pm by Angelo A. Paparelli
No, this post is not the set-up to a joke, except perhaps a nod to the risible circular firing squad that the GOP presidential candidates have formed. [read post]
16 Jan 2012, 5:24 am by Robin E. Shea
In honor of the Year of the Dragon, and in fond farewell to bilingual Jon Huntsman, who announced that he was withdrawing from the presidential race (hmm . . . speaking Mandarin in a Republican debate? [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 2:58 pm by Benjamin Wittes
Peter Margulies’s reporting on AALS panels continues with this dispatch: Libya and Presidential Power Presidential war powers were debated at the AALS conference that spurred my recent posts on detention and military commissions. [read post]
11 Jan 2012, 6:28 am by Tom Parker
In November 2011 President Obama restated his belief that “waterboarding is torture” after aspirant Republican presidential candidates endorsed its use in a television debate. [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 6:32 am by David Oscar Markus
Bush; GOP presidential candidate John McCain; his running mate, Sarah Palin; U.S. [read post]
2 Jan 2012, 4:17 pm
You are a lawyer working for former House Speaker Newt Gingrich’s Presidential campaign. [read post]
31 Dec 2011, 1:48 pm by Steve Vladeck
By Marty Lederman and Steve Vladeck* [Cross-posted at OpinioJuris] Section 1021 of the NDAA and the Laws of War In our companion post, we explained that section 1021 of the NDAA will not have the dramatic effects that many critics have predicted–in particular, that it will not affect the unresolved question of whether the 2001 Authorization for Use of Military Force (AUMF) would authorize a future President to place a U.S citizen or resident who is apprehended in the United States in… [read post]
31 Dec 2011, 1:20 pm by Marty Lederman
by Marty Lederman By Marty Lederman and Steve Vladeck* Section 1021 of the NDAA and the Laws of War In our companion post, we explained that section 1021 of the NDAA will not have the dramatic effects that many critics have predicted–in particular, that it will not affect the unresolved question of whether the 2001 Authorization for Use of Military Force (AUMF) would authorize a future President to place a U.S citizen or resident who is apprehended in the United States in long-term military… [read post]
28 Dec 2011, 12:00 am by RegBlog
    “FTC Issues Pay-for-Delay Report” by Abigail Slater, antitrust attorney, Federal Trade Commission, and member of the New York Bar (May 17) The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) recently released its annual report on pay-for-delay agreements. [read post]
27 Dec 2011, 10:02 am by Peter Landers
While the Sacketts’ case gets into some fairly technical legal ground, the decision will insert the court into the national debate over the EPA, which Republican presidential candidates are putting at the center of their campaign. [read post]
22 Dec 2011, 12:32 pm by lawmrh
You’d have thought so from the reaction to the stink bomb set off by GOP presidential candidate Newt Gingrich’s bashing of judges at last week’s final Iowa debate. [read post]
7 Dec 2011, 2:46 pm by Rick Hasen
And they, too, had debates over how much control should be centralized. [read post]
5 Dec 2011, 6:30 am by Joshua Matz
Supreme Court” as the “Republican Dream” for the 2012 presidential election. [read post]
1 Dec 2011, 12:21 pm by Raffaela Wakeman
    (2) Chapter 47A of title 10, United States Code, relating to military commissions (as amended by the Military Commissions Act of 2009 (title XVIII of Public Law 111-84)). [read post]
23 Nov 2011, 9:01 am by Sonia McNeil
The Republican presidential candidates debated national security and foreign policy issues last night in Washington. [read post]
22 Nov 2011, 2:31 pm by Hal Singer
Or do the political benefits of shirking the entitlement debate outweigh the costs? [read post]
15 Nov 2011, 11:39 am by Charley Moore and Eva Arevuo
When Citizens United vs Federal Election Commission came before the U.S. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 6:23 am by Joshua Matz
  At Bloomberg Businessweek, Noah Feldman argues that Justice Kennedy may rely on the Anti-Injunction Act to avoid deciding whether to strike down the ACA before next year’s presidential election. [read post]
11 Nov 2011, 12:00 am by Mima Mohammed
Rick Perry said he will not pull out of the presidential race after a gaffe at a Republican debate in which he could not remember the name of one of the three federal agencies he would like to eliminate. [read post]
1 Nov 2011, 6:13 am
“We can debate until the cows come home whether there’s really a trust fund or not,” said Olivia Mitchell, a professor at the University of Pennsylvania’s Wharton School who served on a 2001 presidential commission to study Social Security. [read post]