Search for: "Court v. Administrative Office" Results 1001 - 1020 of 14,560
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 May 2023, 3:55 am by Lawrence Solum
Section V reviews an anti-bribery statute enacted by the first Congress. [read post]
10 Jun 2018, 6:52 am by Jillian Blake
Attorney’s Offices at the border to prosecute, to the extent possible, all cases of persons crossing the border without authorization. [read post]
8 Feb 2016, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
The Court of Appeals sustained PERB’s ruling, explaining “that the New York City Charter and Administrative Code, as interpreted in Matter of City of New York v MacDonald (201 AD2d 258, 259 [1st Dept 1994]), required that the discipline of New York City police officers be left to the discretion of the Police Commissioner. [read post]
23 Feb 2015, 7:53 am by John Jascob
According to the complaint, SEC administrative proceedings violate Article II of the Constitution and give the agency an unfair advantage (Gray Financial Group, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Jul 2018, 12:05 pm by Kevin LaCroix
  In reaching its decision, the Court relied heavily on its 1991 decision in Freytag v. [read post]
22 Dec 2009, 1:28 pm by Mike
Golinski to bring a contempt action against the Obama Administration for refusing to obey a federal court order. [read post]
24 Jun 2024, 4:15 am by Steve Brachmann
Supreme Court urging the justices to grant the petition for writ of certiorari in Chestek PLLC v. [read post]
12 Jun 2017, 8:38 am by Chris Walker
This morning the Supreme Court granted review in just one case, and limited its review to one question (three were presented in the petition): Oil States Energy Services LLC v. [read post]
24 Jun 2024, 4:15 am by Steve Brachmann
Supreme Court urging the justices to grant the petition for writ of certiorari in Chestek PLLC v. [read post]
2 Mar 2021, 9:15 am by IPWatchdog
Yesterday, the Supreme Court heard oral arguments in the most closely-watched patent case of the term, United States / Smith & Nephew v. [read post]
13 Jul 2012, 3:35 am
The court directing that the Commissioner appoint new “a duly-qualified, impartial decision-maker authorized to review the recommendation of the hearing officer. [read post]