Search for: "Department of Insurance v. Doe" Results 1001 - 1020 of 2,940
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Feb 2013, 10:16 am by Rick St. Hilaire
The First Circuit Court of Appeals on February 27, 2013 decided in favor of the Museum of Fine Arts, Boston (MFA) and Harvard’s museums in the case of Rubin v. [read post]
15 Apr 2016, 9:25 am by David Cosgrove
[v]Some don’t consider this the fail-safe that the government is touting it to be. [read post]
29 Aug 2013, 1:50 pm by admin
The ruling is in response to the June 26 decision in U.S v. [read post]
29 Jul 2014, 10:03 am by Lyle Denniston
  The three-judge panel’s decision in Sissel v. [read post]
19 Oct 2023, 11:55 am by Robin E. Kobayashi
Large numbers of insurance brokers, employer HR departments, insurance and TPA claims departments, attorneys, and other companies servicing the workers’ compensation industry shifted to a remote work model. [read post]
13 May 2014, 5:04 am by The Public Employment Law Press
., P.C. v DiNapoli, 2014 NY Slip Op 03191, Court of AppealsAmong the patients treated by a physician and a medical group [Providers] were individuals insured by the Empire Plan, New York State's primary health benefit plan. [read post]
11 Jul 2015, 2:14 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
The heavy reliance by group health plans and health insurers upon internet based applications and portals to carry out online enrollment, claims administration and payment, reporting and a host of other key health plan functions makes it particularly important for health plans, their employer or other sponsors, fiduciaries, vendors, and other involved in health plan administration or using or accessing health plan data to verify and ensure the internet data sharing and other applications… [read post]
1 Sep 2008, 2:14 pm
The 2-justice majority (Pesce and Steinhardt) read the 2nd Department's decision in New York & Presbyterian Hosp. v. [read post]
5 Oct 2018, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Disallowing a workers' compensation claim based on the record as it then existed does not bar a claimant from submitting additional evidence to support the claimMatter of Nock v New York City Dept. of Educ., 8 NY Slip Op 02693, Appellate Division, Third DepartmentTykeisha D. [read post]