Search for: "Doe 35" Results 1001 - 1020 of 17,228
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Oct 2013, 9:51 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
However, Simister doesteach the claimed deferral of calculations until receipt of a request to updatethe display from the timing means.Thus, we are constrained by the record to reverse the Examiner’srejection of independent claims 1 and 6-8 under 35 U.S.C. [read post]
3 Sep 2015, 7:16 am by Docket Navigator
The court partially awarded defendant's requested attorney fees under 35 U.S.C. [read post]
16 Jul 2019, 6:59 pm by Howard Friedman
Supreme Court for 35 years (1975- 2010) died on Tuesday at the age of 99. [read post]
7 Jan 2013, 7:12 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
The Board reversed the examiner's obviousness rejection in Ex parte O'Toole:The Examiner’s rejection of claims 14-17, 21-23, 27, 32-34, and 37-48 under 35 U.S.C. [read post]
2 Jan 2013, 2:55 pm by Bradley Wrightsel
It does not appear that there was a lot of focus on the estate tax. [read post]
25 Feb 2013, 7:30 am by Dan Ernst
Constitution, which appeared in the Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy 35 (2012). [read post]
29 Oct 2013, 7:10 am by Docket Navigator
[T]he fact that [defendant] might, in some situations, give the Apps away for free does not mean that [it] cannot, in other situations, be selling the Apps within the meaning of § 271(c). [read post]
11 Apr 2020, 12:28 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
For the foregoing reasons, wevacate and remand the district court’s judgment of invalidity as to claims 7, 12, 35, 37 and 58 of the ’533 patent, claims 18, 34 and 55 of the ’125 patent, claims 5 and 34 ofthe ’357 patent and claims 1 and 22 of the ’842 patent. [read post]
26 May 2017, 7:35 am by Docket Navigator
And because [the expert's] report does not identify any new factual basis for [defendant's] § 101 theory, no discovery violation has occurred. . . . [read post]
30 Apr 2014, 7:02 am by Docket Navigator
[T]he case is likely to be streamlined even if no claims are cancelled because of the estoppel provisions of 35 U.S.C. [read post]
21 Oct 2020, 7:22 am
This is the most up-voted exchange: Question: How many calories does this have? [read post]
2 Jan 2013, 3:58 pm
Here's what that bill does with respect to the estate and gift tax, as currently reported: 1) It raises the maximum estate tax rate to forty percent (40%) from the thirty-five percent (35%) rate of 2012. 2) It maintains the exemption from both estate and gift tax at $5 million, indexed for inflation from 2011, which means $5.25 million is excluded from lifetime gifts or estates of those dying in 2013. 3) It extends the portability provisions of the last law, which means that the… [read post]