Search for: "Doe v. Brown University"
Results 1001 - 1020
of 1,127
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Aug 2024, 3:18 pm
These guiding questions included: “How does current law apply? [read post]
12 May 2023, 10:59 am
Most recently in Brown v. [read post]
19 Feb 2021, 8:38 am
We urge the Senate to press Garland on the following: CRIMINAL LEGAL SYSTEM Americans almost universally agree: The criminal legal system needs a major overhaul. [read post]
6 Aug 2023, 10:00 pm
Twenty Years of The IPKat was published by Oxford University Press in spring 2023.And, speaking of the book, we are happy to re-publish the review that Bill Patry (Mayer Brown) provided of it, as just published by the Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice. [read post]
17 Sep 2015, 2:46 pm
(2) Campbell v. [read post]
6 Jun 2010, 9:01 am
Ferguson was decided it was a "fact" that separate could be equal, while by 1954, when the Court decided Brown v. [read post]
20 Oct 2016, 6:26 am
Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., 529 U.S. 120, 159-60 (2000)). [read post]
22 Nov 2019, 2:05 pm
” From Ziman’s indispensable study, Real Science: What it is, and what it means (Cambridge University Press, 2000): 14. [read post]
3 Aug 2023, 4:49 am
EU law does not expressly prohibit such derogation. [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 5:20 pm
” He declined to say whether he still does. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 10:14 am
” He declined to say whether he still does. [read post]
25 Nov 2020, 1:05 pm
Tucker is an associate professor of law at Drexel University’s Thomas R. [read post]
15 Jan 2013, 9:01 pm
The first option is to do what one does whenever a law has been deemed unconstitutional: Proceed as one would have proceeded, if the law had never been passed in the first place. [read post]
5 Dec 2016, 3:40 pm
Trustees of the California State University (2015) 242 Cal.App.4th 833, 851-852), the Court also acknowledged that “[t]he distinction between elements of a project and measures designed to mitigate impacts of the project may not always be clear” (quoting Lotus v. [read post]
29 Oct 2020, 9:02 pm
Supreme Court’s 1932 decision in Smiley v. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 7:45 pm
And tomorrow, Thursday, the Supreme Court will hear oral argument in Trump v. [read post]
18 Jul 2011, 6:22 am
publication of this classic book (Foundation Press, 2001), although highly influential through its use as a classroom text at Harvard Law School, and passed around in (unpublished) manuscript form, the authors simply couldn’t bring themselves to publish this book because, anchored as it was in the structural/process liberalism of the new administrative state, it had almost nothing to say about Brown v. [read post]
24 Dec 2009, 3:28 pm
“This is one more attempt to erase the history of the peoples of the former Soviet Union, including the heroic history, from historical memory,” Prime Minister Vladimir V. [read post]
25 Mar 2010, 7:07 am
Harvard University Press: Cambridge 2010, pp. 352. $45.00. [read post]
22 Jan 2010, 3:27 pm
Wittes, joined by University of Texas law professor Robert M. [read post]
