Search for: "Does 1-18" Results 1001 - 1020 of 22,462
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Dec 2020, 5:18 am by Stefanie Jackman and Rene T. McNulty
The CFPB issued Part II of its final collection rule on December 18, 2020. [read post]
23 Dec 2018, 12:40 pm
Does De la O and his RB have one more breakout performance in him which could push the Judge over the top and allow him bragging rights for the year? [read post]
19 Jul 2010, 6:57 am
 In general Florida divorce or paternity cases, child support ends as the child reaches the age of majority (turning 18 years old). [read post]
2 Sep 2010, 11:17 am by Dave Lorenzo
  If you stick with it for 18 months, you will receive a positive return on your investment. [read post]
4 Sep 2023, 9:02 am by Marcel Pemsel
It is guaranteed by Art. 11(1) Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union and must be considered when applying Art. 7(1)(f) EUTMR (Constantin Film Produktion v EUIPO at para. 56). [read post]
4 Sep 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
T 641/00 [headnote 2]).[19] In conclusion, the main request cannot be allowed, because the subject matter defined by claim 1 does not involve an inventive step (A 56 EPC 1973).Should you wish to download the whole decision, just click here.The file wrapper can be found here. [read post]
7 Sep 2022, 1:24 am by Roel van Woudenberg
"2.2 Novelty in view of D5 (Article 54(3) EPC)2.2.1 The appellant submitted that, as already acknowledged by the examining division in the appealed decision, document D5 did not disclose the features of the characterising portion of claim 1 as amended, namely the ones of former claims 4 and 5 as well as former claims 17 and 18, i.e. features (c) and (d).2.2.2 The appealed decision contained novelty objections under Article 54(3) EPC with respect to indep [read post]
12 Feb 2012, 10:51 pm by Rick
That’s just the way SWAT does business. [read post]
4 Nov 2013, 10:27 am by Marty Lederman
United States (upholding the federal bribery statute, 18 U.S.C. 666, as applied to a case where the specific conduct of a particular defendant was "a threat to the integrity and proper operation of [a] federal program") and Tennessee v. [read post]
20 Feb 2014, 9:39 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
However, Butamax’s dependent claim 12 here is broader (in some ways) than the referenced claim 1. (...)In my mind, the Butamax claim structure does not fit within the structure authorized by §112(d) because the full effect of the “method” limitation is not included in the dependent composition claim. [read post]
24 Aug 2015, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
Thomas (Minnesota) Legal Studies Research Paper No. 15-19 (2015)).Russell Powell, Does Shari'a Play a Role in Turkey? [read post]
21 Dec 2015, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
, New York Law Journal, Dec. 18, 2015.SCOTUSblog's Zubik v. [read post]
29 Aug 2013, 12:53 pm
The NTSB does not have the authority to make laws, however its recommendations are very seriously considered. [read post]
24 Oct 2022, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
Gilles, What Does Dobbs Mean for the Constitutional Right to a Life-or-Health-Preserving Abortion? [read post]