Search for: "Does 1-30" Results 1001 - 1020 of 27,598
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Jan 2024, 11:54 am by Zachary Lerner
Does the diligent search need to be conducted each and every time a policy is issued or renewed? [read post]
22 Jan 2024, 9:55 am by HRWatchdog
Savage clarifies that the “one for 30” (“statutory accrual”) method does not require benchmark days to be met, unlike the “regular” (“alternative accrual”) method which does require the benchmarks to be met. [read post]
22 Jan 2024, 4:00 am by Brooke MacKenzie
Lawyers are usually given 30 days to respond to a complaint. [read post]
22 Jan 2024, 1:10 am by INFORRM
Title II does not create a right to information. [read post]
19 Jan 2024, 11:52 am by The White Law Group
Securities Fraud Attorneys        If you are concerned about your investments, please call the securities attorneys at The White Law Group at 1-888-637-5510. [read post]
19 Jan 2024, 10:59 am by Keith Szeliga
”[30] The allocation method guides the distribution of indirect costs to cost objectives and must distribute indirect costs to final cost objectives in a manner that reflect each cost objective’s fair share of the indirect [read post]
19 Jan 2024, 10:34 am by luiza
  Freepoint apparently earned over $30 million in profits from the scheme. [read post]
19 Jan 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
 The doctrine does not apply where a petitioner challenges a single discrete action, inaction, or decision and the resulting effects, even if continuous, are not intrinsically unlawful (Application of Ayers, 48 Ed Dept Rep 350, Decision No. 15,883; Appeal of a Student with a Disability, 48 id. 146, Decision No. 15,821, art 78 dismissed Matter of Reyes v Mills [Sup Ct, Albany County 2009, Zwack, J.]).I agree with respondent that petitioner’s reassignment was a discrete act… [read post]
19 Jan 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
 The doctrine does not apply where a petitioner challenges a single discrete action, inaction, or decision and the resulting effects, even if continuous, are not intrinsically unlawful (Application of Ayers, 48 Ed Dept Rep 350, Decision No. 15,883; Appeal of a Student with a Disability, 48 id. 146, Decision No. 15,821, art 78 dismissed Matter of Reyes v Mills [Sup Ct, Albany County 2009, Zwack, J.]).I agree with respondent that petitioner’s reassignment was a discrete act… [read post]
19 Jan 2024, 5:55 am by Paloma van Groll
Of the 30 submissions, 17 submissions (57 percent) mention at least one gender-related issue. [read post]
19 Jan 2024, 4:00 am by Alan Macek
For the last 30+ years, patents granted based on patent applications filed after 1989 expire based on their filing date. [read post]
19 Jan 2024, 2:07 am by David Pocklington
Consequently, the inspecting architect recommended Zinsser Grade 1 paint (ZS) for the redecoration. [read post]
18 Jan 2024, 11:11 pm by Josh Blackman
[About 30 amicus briefs were filed to reverse the Colorado Supreme Court’s ruling that disqualified President Trump from the ballot.] [read post]
18 Jan 2024, 10:33 am by Lazar Radic
Not only does this contradict the principle that “injunctive relief should be no more burdensome to the defendant than necessary to provide complete relief to the plaintiffs,” it could also cause serious harm to nonparties who had no opportunity to argue for more limited relief. [read post]