Search for: "FORD MOTOR CO"
Results 1001 - 1020
of 1,406
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Feb 2010, 3:21 am
" Increasingly, "Toyota appears to be facing its own version of Ford Motor Co.'s crisis 10 years ago over rollovers of SUVs with Firestone tires. [read post]
23 Feb 2010, 12:56 am
In that case, involving hundreds of accidents linked to faulty Firestone tires mounted on Ford Explorer sport-utility vehicles, the chief executives of Ford Motor Co. and Bridgestone Corp.'s U.S. operations clashed in congressional hearings that ultimately led to the passage of new safety laws. [read post]
16 Feb 2010, 7:27 am
We’ve stated it here before: Pedestrians hardly ever do well against a motor vehicle during a traffic accident. [read post]
16 Feb 2010, 4:00 am
And among those surveyed by the Ford Motor Co., more than 93% of 1,000 licensed drivers say they support a nationwide ban. [read post]
13 Feb 2010, 1:55 pm
Ford Motor Co. (2002) 87 Cal.App.4th 472, 480.) [read post]
12 Feb 2010, 2:13 pm
While all automakers have employees who handle NHTSA issues, Toyota may be the only one of the major companies that also has hired the former safety investigation agency staffers.Spokesmen for General Motors Co., Ford Motor Co., Chrysler Group LLC and Honda Motor Co. all say their companies have no ex-NHTSA people who deal with the agency on defects.The recent developments with this Toyota recall mess are astonishing and have to make you… [read post]
12 Feb 2010, 8:03 am
" To put Toyota's potential exposure in context, consider a $368-million verdict against Ford Motor Co., which was blamed in the rollover of an Explorer that rendered a San Diego woman quadriplegic in 2002. [read post]
11 Feb 2010, 12:29 pm
Ford Motor Co. has announced it will upgrade the brake software on its Ford Fusion and Mercury Milan hybrid models built prior to October 17, 2009, after the research firm Consumer Reports detected a braking issue. [read post]
11 Feb 2010, 12:29 pm
Ford Motor Co. has announced it will upgrade the brake software on its Ford Fusion and Mercury Milan hybrid models built prior to October 17, 2009, after the research firm Consumer Reports detected a braking issue. [read post]
10 Feb 2010, 7:33 am
Ford Motor Co., supra, 19 Cal.3d at p. 548 [ the fact that evidence is circumstantial does not mean that it cannot be substantial. . . . the jury is entitled to accept persuasive circumstantial evidence even where contradicted by direct testimony ]; see also Scott v. [read post]
7 Feb 2010, 9:28 pm
Ford Motor Co., 283 F.3d 33, 62 (2d Cir. 2002)). [read post]
6 Feb 2010, 7:13 am
Ford Motor Co. (1977) 19 Cal.3d 530, 548 [ Where contributory negligence is asserted as a defense, and where there is "some evidence of a substantial character" to support a finding that such negligence occurred, it is prejudicial error to refuse an instruction on this issue, since defendant is thereby denied a basic theory of his defense ] overruled on other grounds in Soule v. [read post]
2 Feb 2010, 4:30 am
Ford Motor Co., --- S.W.3d ---, No. [read post]
29 Jan 2010, 8:50 am
In a related development, Ford Motor Co. has halted production of some full-sized commercial vehicles in China because they contain gas pedals built by the same company behind the accelerators in Toyota Motor Corp.'s recent recall. [read post]
29 Jan 2010, 8:50 am
In a related development, Ford Motor Co. has halted production of some full-sized commercial vehicles in China because they contain gas pedals built by the same company behind the accelerators in Toyota Motor Corp.'s recent recall. [read post]
28 Jan 2010, 6:25 pm
CTS also makes pedals for Honda Motor Co., Mitsubishi Motors, Nissan Motor Co. and Ford Motor Co. in China, but the company said pedals made for those manufacturers don't have the same design. [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 5:00 am
June 25, 2002); In re Ford Motor Co. [read post]
22 Jan 2010, 9:01 pm
Also, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration announced this week that it is examining Ford Motor Co. [read post]
19 Jan 2010, 9:01 pm
A key question is whether the courts below were applying the correct definition of “producing cause,” in light of the Court’s decision in 2007 in Ford Motor Co. v. [read post]
18 Jan 2010, 6:05 pm
” Defendants bolstered their argument by citing to In re Ford Motor Co., 345 F.3d 1315 (11th Cir. 2003), a case in which the plaintiff’s request for direct access to Ford’s databases in order to search for additional claims analogous to her own was denied on appeal in the absence of “some condition such as improper conduct on the part of the responding party” and because “the district court failed to state any abuse of the… [read post]
