Search for: "Head v State" Results 1001 - 1020 of 14,945
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Mar 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
It follows the May 2021 ruling of the District Court of The Hague in Milieudefensie et al. v. [read post]
18 Mar 2023, 8:08 am by Guest Author
In the context of content moderation (and platform regulation more broadly), this can mean that rather than the flat on-off debates we are currently having (as with the debate over Section 230 in Gonzalez v. [read post]
18 Mar 2023, 8:03 am by Guest Author
At the oral arguments in two currently pending Supreme Court cases—United States v. [read post]
17 Mar 2023, 8:25 am by Daniel Gilman
Her departure, and her stated reasons therefore, were not encouraging for those of us who would prefer to see the FTC function as a stable, economically grounded, and genuinely bipartisan independent agency. [read post]
16 Mar 2023, 7:46 am by Larry
The case is United States v. [read post]
14 Mar 2023, 5:08 am by Lianjun Li, Donald Sham and Angus Yu
Introduction In Perusahaan Perseroan (Persero) Pt Pertamina v Trevaskis Ltd and Others [2023] HKCFA 5, the Appeal Committee of the Court of Final Appeal (“CFA”), upon hearing submissions from both parties on 16 February 2023, granted leave to Perusahaan Perseroan (Persero) Pt Pertamina (“Plaintiff”) to appeal to the full court of the CFA on the following question of great general or public importance (“GGPI”) relating to the Convention on Limitation of… [read post]
13 Mar 2023, 4:33 am by Peter J. Sluka
 Those changes met Court approval in Boilermakers Local 154 Retirement Fund v Chevron Corp., 73 A3d 934 [Del Ch 2013], and ATP Tour, Inc. v Deutscher Tennis Bund, 91 A3d 554 [Del 2014]. [read post]
12 Mar 2023, 9:05 pm by Richard J. Pierce, Jr.
The head of the Center for the Study of the Administrative State, Adam White, told me that he believes that the FTC under Khan’s leadership has decided that it is best served by maximizing uncertainty about antitrust laws. [read post]
11 Mar 2023, 4:38 am by Cyberleagle
The government’s ECHR Memorandum seeks to head off any objection along these lines by stressing the higher degree of certainty that it expects would be achieved when Ofcom’s Codes of Practice have been laid before Parliament and come into effect. [read post]
11 Mar 2023, 4:24 am by centerforartlaw
Q: On April 21, 2022, the Supreme Court in Cassirer v. [read post]
8 Mar 2023, 7:20 am by Marcia Coyle
Supreme Court may have thought—or hoped—that overturning the abortion rights landmark decision, Roe v. [read post]
8 Mar 2023, 4:00 am by Eric Segall
Bruen is quite simply a national nightmare.In United States v. [read post]