Search for: "Holding v. State"
Results 1001 - 1020
of 69,975
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Mar 2023, 8:19 am
In Bartenwerfer v. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 6:41 am
Wednesday, the Court handed down its decision in Walker v. [read post]
9 May 2010, 9:00 pm
Interpreting the NYC Administrative Code, the Court holds that the Faragher v City of Boca Raton, 524 US 775 (1998) and Burlington Industries,... [read post]
2 Feb 2007, 2:40 pm
Note that there is nothing wrong with holding bloggers responsible for defamatory content that they themselves produce, as long as the states' rules are consistent with the constitutional rules of New York Times v. [read post]
15 Jul 2008, 3:14 pm
New Jersey Caselaw: Through State v. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 3:45 pm
[Section 3 of the Fourteenth Amendment and the Incompatibility Clause both apply to "officers under the United States" and must thus mean the same thing] The oral argument today in Trump v. [read post]
16 Nov 2016, 1:12 pm
In Schriro v. [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 2:54 pm
This holding is the latest defeat for Congress’s 1996 handiwork. [read post]
3 Feb 2015, 12:58 pm
The OSP, which is currently on hold after a state superior court judge ruled... [read post]
22 Jun 2023, 10:52 am
In Tyler v. [read post]
14 Dec 2014, 7:47 pm
CLS Bank (2014), patent owners and inventors in the Information Technology world should be celebrating the decision last week in DDR Holdings v. [read post]
23 Jun 2020, 9:21 am
United States, the first Supreme Court decision ever to hold a statute of Congress unconstitutional because incompatible with Article II prerogatives of the President. [read post]
23 Jun 2020, 9:21 am
United States, the first Supreme Court decision ever to hold a statute of Congress unconstitutional because incompatible with Article II prerogatives of the President. [read post]
17 Apr 2014, 8:50 am
Co. v. [read post]
7 Nov 2007, 7:46 am
Per Scott v. [read post]
17 Feb 2013, 10:02 am
But the Supreme Court in U.S. v. [read post]
26 Sep 2017, 1:05 pm
United States, arguing that the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals decision holding that the government's acquisition of cell phone records did not violate the Fourth Amendment should be affirmed. [read post]
23 Jun 2019, 5:51 pm
In Romano-Murphy v Commissioner, 152 T.C. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 1:30 pm
Hodges, holding that states must both allow same-sex couples to marry and recognize same-sex marriages from other states. [read post]
8 Dec 2022, 12:13 pm
Earlier this week, on December 6, 2022, the Second Circuit held in United States v. [read post]
