Search for: "J.A." Results 1001 - 1020 of 1,275
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Apr 2017, 8:59 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
” Id.Moreover, despite the parties’ stipulation that they competedin the same market, J.A. 2112, ¶ 148, the courtfound that Nichia failed to prove that this competitionwas meaningful, Nichia, 2016 WL 310142, at *65. [read post]
28 Jan 2020, 2:08 pm by Patricia Hughes
After a jury found Gerald Stanley not guilty of second-degree murder in the shooting death of Colten Boushie, the federal government amended the Criminal Code to eliminate peremptory challenges in the selection of juries, as well as a change in the trier of challenges for cause. [read post]
14 Jun 2007, 12:34 pm
Limitation periods start when a Plaintiff has, or ought to have, discovered, a viable cause of action for any head of damage. [read post]
30 Sep 2011, 1:00 pm by Robert Tanha
Disposition Rosenberg J.A. allowed the appeal in part as follows: The order of child support was to be terminated as of November 30, 2010; The respondent was to pay to the appellant spousal support as of December 1, 2010 in the amount of   $433 per month; Term 4 of the Order requiring the appellant to pay child support arrears was deleted; Term 9 of the Order was varied to require that arrears of child support and spousal support payable by the respondent was to be paid out of… [read post]
13 Sep 2009, 10:00 pm
Health Perspect. 2005; 113(8):926-933; Politch, J.A "Bisphenol A and Risk Assessment," Environ. [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 4:00 am by West Coast Environmental Law
[at para 36] However, Rennie J.A. found that the claimants’ pleadings were overly broad and failed to “zero in” on specific laws or government action that constitute the deprivation to the section 7 rights, and upheld the motions’ judges decisions to strike the section 15 claims. [read post]
3 May 2010, 1:04 pm by MacIsaac
  In my opinion it is stated briefly and accurately in the following passage in the judgment of Aylesworth J.A., concurred in by Robertson C.J.O., in Woodward v. [read post]
17 Feb 2009, 3:34 pm
Finch, J.A., as he then was, stated on behalf of the Court that the purpose of Rule 30 was: This Court has repeatedly said that the purpose of Rule 30 is to put the parties on an equal footing with respect to medical evidence. [read post]
3 Feb 2010, 1:02 pm by MacIsaac
Newbury J.A. said: [14]   … This is not to suggest that an inference may not be drawn as a matter of fact in a particular case, where a vehicle leaves the road or a driver loses control; but as the trial judge stated … such an inference will be “highly dependent on the facts” of the case and the explanation required to rebut it will “vary in accordance with the strength of the inference sought to be drawn by the plaintiff. [read post]