Search for: "John Doe 2"
Results 1001 - 1020
of 13,839
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Mar 2008, 6:53 am
(2) The 1790s Federalists disliked state power and decentralization generally. [read post]
7 Dec 2018, 3:30 am
What does it take to prove this type of religious harassment? [read post]
26 Feb 2014, 10:39 pm
John Cook surely knows the contents of his own paper. [read post]
23 Mar 2015, 2:48 am
Text Copyright John L. [read post]
2 Oct 2011, 10:34 am
Does God exist? [read post]
16 Oct 2017, 3:17 am
John Edward Guzman d/b/a Club Ed Surf School and Camp v. [read post]
25 Dec 2010, 7:53 pm
Hmmm, how does Salmonella Marler sound? [read post]
6 Mar 2012, 2:47 am
Until a few days ago, if one who was board certified used that title in any letterhead or ad, the following disclaimer was necessary: ""[1] The [name of the private certifying organization] is not affiliated with any governmental authority [,] [2] Certification is not a requirement for the practice of law in the State of New York and [3] does not necessarily indicate greater competence than other attorneys experience in this field of law. [read post]
29 Apr 2016, 8:42 am
So to call a registration incontestable is, I think, misleading and inappropriate.Text Copyright John L. [read post]
29 Apr 2022, 12:05 pm
Which it most definitely does. [read post]
17 Jan 2021, 3:31 pm
It does this, in part through a natural law concept that a human being has a telos - a purpose or a design. [read post]
5 Aug 2007, 5:18 am
The first du Pont factor, the dissimilarity of the marks, led the Board to reverse a Section 2(d) refusal of the KID TENNIS & Design mark (shown below) for various clothing items ("KID TENNIS" disclaimed). [read post]
29 Dec 2007, 1:07 pm
John Doe, et al. [read post]
15 May 2015, 1:00 pm
Senator John Thune (R-SD) told reporters that “[i]f it comes to letting the thing lapse or doing a short-term extension, I think the votes will be there in the House eventually. [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 2:54 am
Section 2(c) is not limited in scope to full names, but encompasses "surnames, shortened names, nicknames, etc., so long as the name in question does, in fact, 'identify' a particular living individual. [read post]
26 Oct 2007, 2:16 pm
John - see this Advance Indiana entry. [read post]
2 Jan 2020, 12:37 pm
Presumably people of two different genders, and a fictitious name deliberately so chosen by counsel for the plaintiff (since "John Doe" would have worked equally well). [read post]
4 May 2010, 3:03 am
"It found that Registrant's mark "suggests equipment and accessories that provide 'easy access' to the internet," whereas Applicant's mark does not have this "specific connotation," especially since Applicant's goods are for use other than broadband wireless access.And so the Board concluded that the differences in the mark outweigh the other relevant du Pont factors.TTABlog comment: Boring Section 2(d) cases like this that make… [read post]
11 Apr 2008, 1:00 am
The movie entry was "too brief" and does not "reflect on the popularity" of the movie today. [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 4:00 am
., Churching NIMBYs: Creating Affordable Housing on Church Property, (Yale Law Journal, Vol. 133, No. 4, 2024).Nelson Tebbe, Does Dobbs Reinforce Democracy? [read post]
