Search for: "Levis v. Levis"
Results 1001 - 1020
of 3,007
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Feb 2008, 10:57 am
Added to the mix here were charges of the most serious sort (molestation of his own brother's children in their home where he was a guest) levied against an individual with a prior criminal history. [read post]
13 Jun 2012, 10:04 pm
Goodemote v. [read post]
13 Jun 2012, 10:04 pm
Goodemote v. [read post]
4 May 2016, 1:40 pm
Hendricks v. [read post]
4 May 2016, 1:40 pm
Hendricks v. [read post]
4 May 2016, 1:40 pm
Hendricks v. [read post]
29 May 2023, 10:12 am
Knapp v Bristol City Council (2023) UKUT 118 (LC) The first Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber) decision on a banning order case. [read post]
8 Mar 2021, 3:47 pm
In Seattle School District v. [read post]
12 Apr 2011, 4:16 pm
467/08, Padawan v SGAE in which the ECJ – to the contrary –stipulates that right holders should be “adequately” compensated for the use made of their protected works. [read post]
11 Aug 2015, 10:17 am
EDISON, Inc., v. [read post]
26 May 2012, 9:26 am
The appellant in United States v. [read post]
27 Sep 2008, 11:31 pm
• Winter v. [read post]
24 Aug 2011, 9:29 am
Fausto v. [read post]
25 Jan 2011, 5:54 am
Those damages are levied as a form of punishment and deterrence against the offender. [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 10:48 am
On 6 July 2011, the UKSC delivered its judgment in Scottish Widows plc v Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs (Scotland); Scottish Widows plc No 2 v Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs (Scotland); Scottish Widows plc v Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs (Scotland) [2011] UKSC 32. [read post]
15 May 2024, 10:00 am
" Viewed in the light most favorable to plaintiff as the nonmovant (see Vega v Restani Constr. [read post]
15 May 2024, 10:00 am
" Viewed in the light most favorable to plaintiff as the nonmovant (see Vega v Restani Constr. [read post]
27 May 2021, 8:02 am
Norton v. [read post]
17 May 2007, 12:16 pm
Today, the Wall Street Journal has this editorial on the bill that amends the law at issue in the Davenport v. [read post]
4 Apr 2017, 9:05 pm
Lawsuit by pilot against landowner who shot down his drone is dismissed for lack of federal jurisdiction [Cyrus Farivar, ArsTechnica; earlier here and (criminal case) here] Super-broad readings of Emoluments Clause intended to trip up President Trump might have unwelcome consequences for over 2 million military retirees and 2.8 million federal employees also affected by the Clause’s interpretation [Chuck Blanchard via Andy Grewal; earlier on Emoluments Clause] “Appeals court throws… [read post]
