Search for: "Marks v. Howe" Results 1001 - 1020 of 14,332
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Sep 2008, 3:22 am
So here’s one last bite — a rundown on how the District of Oregon analyzed the dilution claim in Adidas America, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Apr 2019, 10:29 am by Camilla Hrdy
How is a person -- a person who wants to get a mark supposed to tell what the PTO is going to do? [read post]
21 Sep 2011, 11:30 pm by Lara
Facebook TMs lots of LIKE marks Burning Man’s Burning Marks Trademark Attorney Ponders Parody — Yankees v Evil Enterprises Nike 3, Jesuits 0 Geekview IP Week in Review [read post]
15 Aug 2020, 4:05 am by Nedim Malovic
In sum, registering 3D shapes as trade marks is a challenging – if not often chimeric – endeavour.In addition, the decision also adds to the body of cases (and literature) which shows how thorny the issue of polls is. [read post]
27 Oct 2021, 8:30 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Here, Brewery never explains how granting the application to register the mark for sanitizing preparations in Class 5 would cause Brewery to suffer an Article III injury. [read post]
26 Mar 2019, 7:31 am by Michael Risch
Before the ink was dry in Brunetti, commentators wondered how lifting the Section 2(a) restrictions would affect the volume of registrations of marks previously made unregistrable by that same section. [read post]
4 Jan 2023, 1:36 am by Kevin Bercimuelle-Chamot
In Neoperl v EUIPO (Representation of a cylindrical sanitary insert part) the General Court had the opportunity to review the rejection of an application for a position tactile mark. [read post]
8 Nov 2011, 9:28 am by Eric
By Guest Blogger Mark Bender, with some comments by Eric Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Trading Post Australia Pty Ltd [2011] FCA 1086 (September 22, 2011, corrected October 10, 2011) [Eric’s introduction: Mark Bender is a business law lecturer at Monash University in Australia and an expert in Australian online trademark law. [read post]
8 Dec 2014, 6:51 am
Neither TRIPS nor the Paris Convention specify the framework within which product shapes are protected, though it seems to be an almost universal phenomenon that national law makes some sort of special provision for them.Annette then took the audience through a sequence of shape-as-trade-mark decisions involving Community trade mark registration: C-371/06 Benetton v G-Star, T-508/08 Bang & Olufsen (illustrated right) and Hauck/Stokke (the TRIPP TRAPP case,… [read post]
27 Jun 2024, 2:08 pm by Christopher J. Walker
How the SEC is structured violates the constitutional rule from Free Enterprise Fund v. [read post]