Search for: "Matter of A.D"
Results 1001 - 1020
of 1,075
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Nov 2013, 12:09 pm
By John G. [read post]
23 May 2016, 1:00 pm
Leydier, 62 A.D.3d 627 (reversed on other grounds, 13 N.Y.3d 827). [read post]
14 Jan 2019, 3:08 pm
Co., 166 A.D.3d 1 (N.Y. [read post]
8 Oct 2008, 11:50 am
Lederle Laboratories, 26 A.D.3d 475, 810 N.Y.S.2d 506, 508-509 (N.Y. [read post]
3 Nov 2022, 10:45 am
We even have some reference to Henry de Bracton’s Laws and Customes of England, a work published circa 1235 A.D. [read post]
14 Mar 2016, 2:56 am
The bonds in both the Jacobson and Nine Thirty FEF matters contain riders which provide that they will cover loss resulting directly from the dishonest acts of any Outside Investment Advisor na [read post]
8 Jul 2020, 11:17 pm
In 1944, New York’s highest court, the Court of Appeals, held, in a silicosis personal injury case, that: “[i]t is a matter of common knowledge that it is injurious to the lungs and dangerous to health to work in silica dust, a fact which defendant was bound to know. [read post]
7 Jun 2023, 5:01 am
Neither Westlaw nor Lexis has the case, and the case found at 925 F.3d 1339 is A.D. v Azar, 925 F.3d 1291 (D.C. [read post]
14 Mar 2008, 6:07 am
A.D. 2005) (expert testimony on whether vaccine conponent was an "adulterant" within meaning of Vaccine Act did not create issue of fact because we "need not accept a plaintiff's experts' op [read post]
27 Jul 2009, 4:00 am
Loverro, 250 A.D. 206 (2d Dept. 1937), aff'd 276 NY 551 (1937)); see also First Nat. [read post]
2 Feb 2020, 7:05 am
In New Jersey, for example, there was good authority that a claimed oral agreement between the parties was of no effect; only written agreements mattered. [read post]
23 Apr 2021, 10:07 am
., 54 N.Y.2d 880, 883 [1981] [where the plaintiff's books, articles and personal appearances were designed to project his name and personality to establish his reputation as a leading authority on professional football, and actively sought publicity for his views and professional writings, which were the subject of the litigation]; Park v Capital Cities Communications, 181 A.D.2d 192, 197 [4th Dept 1992], appeal dismissed 80 N.Y.2d 1022 [1992], lv dismissed in part, denied in part 81… [read post]
7 Jun 2007, 11:48 am
Hunt, 13 A.D.3d 1041, 1042 (3rd Dept. 2004). [read post]
27 Jan 2012, 11:59 am
Instead, the cases ordered disclosure under the traditional discovery principles of Rule 26(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, that is, `[p]arties may obtain discovery regarding any nonprivileged matter that is relevant to any party's claim or defense,’ and that for purposes of discovery, `relevant’ evidence `need not be admissible at the trial if the discovery appears reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence. [read post]
28 Jul 2009, 3:00 am
., 246 A.D.2d 246, 676 N.Y.S.2d 569, 37 U.C.C. [read post]
25 Jun 2009, 4:29 am
As a matter of law, this approval is granted only upon completion of the PMA process. [read post]
17 Sep 2009, 4:30 am
A couple of cases we've posted about recently started us thinking - a dangerous turn of events, we know. [read post]
9 Jan 2010, 4:12 am
Strobel and State Farm, A.D. 09-11444 (C.P. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 11:17 am
Hanifin, 77 A.D.3d 1181 (N.Y. [read post]
2 Dec 2015, 12:38 pm
A.D. 03-319.No. [read post]
