Search for: "Meanes v. State"
Results 1001 - 1020
of 69,268
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Dec 2006, 9:08 pm
United States, supra, 98 U.S. at page 164; Watson v. [read post]
16 Nov 2018, 5:00 am
The term also means (1) any agent of such a person, and (2) a State or political subdivision of a State and any agency or instrumentality of a State or a political subdivision of a State, and any interstate agency, but such term does not include the United States, or a corporation wholly owned by the Government of the United States. [read post]
15 Apr 2014, 9:58 am
However, the ruling doesn't mean that former spouses automatically are entitled to a portion of their ex's military retirement pay, and each case is decided according to individual facts and state law. [read post]
17 Jul 2019, 9:01 pm
In Rucho v. [read post]
24 Mar 2014, 11:55 am
On March 12, 2014, the Supreme Court of Ohio heard oral argument in the case of State v. [read post]
Hensel Phelps v. San Diego interprets what is a Public Work for the Application of Prevailing Wages.
2 Aug 2011, 11:45 am
In Hensel Phelps Construction Co. v. [read post]
21 Jul 2019, 5:00 am
On June 26, 2019 the Supreme Court of the United States issued a 9-0 decision in the case of Kisor v. [read post]
21 Jul 2019, 5:00 am
On June 26, 2019 the Supreme Court of the United States issued a 9-0 decision in the case of Kisor v. [read post]
25 Feb 2016, 5:46 am
If this content is not in your news reader, it means the page you are viewing infringes copyright. [read post]
30 Jun 2022, 10:50 am
As recently as 2015, in Arizona State Legislature v. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 2:37 pm
United States v. [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 2:05 pm
The United States Supreme Court sent shock waves to the criminal defense community with their decision in Carpenter V. [read post]
5 Nov 2013, 8:48 pm
In Monday’s argument in Sandifer v. [read post]
30 Apr 2007, 3:05 pm
The Supreme Court released an interesting opinion today in Mead v. [read post]
27 Jun 2019, 4:00 am
This imports the sequencing familiar in the Chevron context from United States v. [read post]
29 Oct 2015, 7:18 am
In their ongoing court challenge to the rule, regulators from Massachusetts and Montana argued that the SEC’s amendments to Regulation A violate the plain meaning of the Securities Act, overstep the Commission’s delegated authority, and strip investors of valuable state law protections (Lindeen v. [read post]
2 May 2016, 8:30 am
State v. [read post]
14 Jun 2019, 4:34 pm
Otherwise stated, whether the article means that – as stated in the headline – the claimant was one of two found “guilty of killing a woman while racing their cars”. [read post]
15 Jun 2009, 3:18 am
State v. [read post]
9 Dec 2009, 9:11 am
Inc. v. [read post]
