Search for: "Parker v. Parker"
Results 1001 - 1020
of 2,550
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Feb 2012, 10:06 pm
Justice Tom Parker observed that the viability rule in Roe v. [read post]
9 May 2007, 5:11 am
" Parker v. [read post]
13 Nov 2014, 7:41 am
But the Court of Appeals (Parker, Cabranes and Walker) objects to the union's maneuvering. [read post]
30 Mar 2021, 6:27 am
The Court of Appeals revives her case because the trial court did not properly instruct the jury on the elements of her claim.The case is Tardif v. [read post]
14 Oct 2012, 7:57 am
United States v. [read post]
9 Jun 2023, 5:24 am
" This became the Central Park Karen case, which has reached the Second Circuit.The case is Cooper v. [read post]
31 Jan 2017, 6:32 am
The jury awarded each of them $18 million, and the Court of Appeals affirms.The case is Restivo v. [read post]
25 Mar 2016, 9:11 am
The case is Crawford v. [read post]
2 Jul 2015, 7:05 am
The case is Dotson v. [read post]
10 Mar 2014, 10:13 am
The Court of Appeals (Jacobs, Kearse and Parker) says that Kovacs can invoke Couto. [read post]
3 Dec 2020, 6:18 am
In the end, the plaintiffs end up with a dollar.The case is Wierzbic v. [read post]
17 May 2022, 6:11 am
This evidence convinces the Court of Appeals (Parker, Lee and Park) that defendants were not discriminating against anyone. [read post]
11 Mar 2015, 7:33 am
The decision sheds light on what the Court wants the complaints to look like.The case is Bohnet v. [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 6:34 am
The case is Family Equality v. [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 6:03 am
The developers lose the case, not because the Village did not demonstrate anti-Jewish animus, but on more mundane procedural grounds.The case is BMG Monroe LLC v. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 10:27 am
Plaintiff wins the appeal as the Court of Appeals reinstates the case.The case is Michel v. [read post]
24 Sep 2020, 6:20 am
The case is Humphrey v. [read post]
6 Jan 2014, 8:22 am
Case Name: JOY KLOMLIAM v. [read post]
25 Apr 2016, 6:38 am
I totally overlooked this case when it came down in August 2015, but it's worth revisiting now because it affects everyone who handles wage and hour cases under the Fair Labor Standards Act.The case is Cheeks v. [read post]
11 Aug 2021, 6:16 am
This is such a case, the Court of Appeals (Raggi, Parker and Carney) holds. [read post]
