Search for: "People v J."
Results 1001 - 1020
of 7,242
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Nov 2011, 12:51 pm
People v Wheeler, 59 AD3d 1007, lv denied 12 NY3d 711). [read post]
29 Jul 2009, 7:00 am
Marshall v. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 7:42 am
"] Tomorrow, the Supreme Court will hear oral argument in Trump v. [read post]
30 Jan 2018, 4:05 pm
Reasonable readers must be taught that that the First Amendment allows us the “breathing space” to make such errors (See, New York Times Co. v. [read post]
20 May 2022, 1:30 am
Lord Tyre agreed with Hickinbottom J’s decision in Wilkes that the test for safety requires an objective approach to what persons generally are entitled to expect. [read post]
6 Mar 2009, 5:57 am
People v. [read post]
New York Appellate Criminal Cases Originating from the New York Supreme Court NY County - LexisNexis
2 Oct 2009, 11:45 am
The People of the State ... ... appellant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, New York County (Renee White, J.), ... 2. [read post]
22 May 2009, 2:57 pm
People v. [read post]
New York Appellate Criminal Cases Originating from the New York Supreme Court NY County - LexisNexis
15 Dec 2009, 12:50 pm
The People of the State ... ... appellant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, New York County (Ronald Zweibel, J.), ... 2. [read post]
1 Mar 2012, 6:16 am
District Judge Richard J. [read post]
28 Jan 2007, 4:40 pm
Not long after posting about spam, I picked up (via the Tech News Review feed) this story from Friday’s Times, a report of a case (Microsoft v McDonald, 12 December 2006, Levinson J in the High Court, Chancery) from the tail end of 2006…where Microsoft took on the spammers and…well, IPKat has a good summary, so over to them: Microsoft normally protected Hotmail subscribers against spam by setting up its own ‘target accounts’, which it used as decoys to… [read post]
2 Sep 2008, 5:54 am
Most people misassume that 512(c) eliminates all liability for user-caused copyright infringement, but it only eliminates damages and limits the scope of injunctive relief in 512(j)--but a court can still issue an injunction. 512(j) is, as far as I know, not been litigated, and frankly I don't understand all of its provisions. [read post]
23 Jan 2017, 5:00 am
In its recent decision in the case of Rohe v. [read post]
30 Apr 2023, 6:08 am
" Do people still read John Barth? [read post]
31 Jul 2016, 12:00 am
Scotch reviews Lennard J. [read post]
10 May 2015, 12:30 am
Eyes: How J. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 12:44 pm
”Taking the patents one by one, Floyd J noted that the skilled person would approach the ‘698 patent “with the teaching of the patent and the background knowledge … firmly in mind. [read post]
6 Jul 2018, 5:00 am
June 1, 2018 Bowes, J., Panella, J. and Stabile, J.) [read post]
4 Oct 2013, 9:38 pm
J. [read post]
28 Dec 2018, 4:04 pm
See Appellant’s Br., Norman v. [read post]
