Search for: "Peoples v. State" Results 1001 - 1020 of 50,483
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
One of the more recent and aggressive shifts in state tax administration has been the rise of the state False Claims Act, or FCA, tax lawsuit. [read post]
7 Sep 2013, 7:55 am by Jeff Redding
  I mention the cost issue here because ‘2 v. 3’ often devolves into ‘2 x $45,000 v. 3 x $45,000. [read post]
20 Apr 2020, 2:51 pm
  The state can surely respond to that by charging Mr. [read post]
15 Jul 2009, 4:43 pm
On July 14, 2009, the Court of Appeals published  its Per Curiam  Opinion in the consolidated matters of State of Michigan v. [read post]
19 Apr 2017, 5:33 pm by Mary Whisner
The editors of State Crime (Journal of the International State Crime Initiative) invite papers for a special issue on State Crime and Colonialism (v. 7, no. 2, Nov. 2018). [read post]
11 Mar 2022, 11:04 am by Peter Charles
Many people carry knives or similar tools for work that can be used as weapons, aggressively or defensively. [read post]
27 Nov 2006, 5:02 am
"What, No Tipping the People's Servants? [read post]
25 Jun 2022, 9:05 am by Tom Smith
Critics say the Court’s 6-3 decision in Dobbs v. [read post]
28 Oct 2013, 2:47 pm by Stephen Bilkis
Second, the United States Supreme Court has "insisted that the discretion of the official in the field be circumscribed as held in Delaware v Prouse. [read post]
16 May 2014, 2:12 pm by Francisco Macías
  While most people educated in the United States are familiar with Brown, I would like to bring your attention to more arcane cases, with arguably equal significance. [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 1:47 pm
In a 6-3 decision, the United States Supreme Court has upheld the tax credit premium assistance (subsidies) provided to individuals who live in states without a state operated health insurance exchange.The case is King v. [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 1:47 pm
In a 6-3 decision, the United States Supreme Court has upheld the tax credit premium assistance (subsidies) provided to individuals who live in states without a state operated health insurance exchange.The case is King v. [read post]