Search for: "Quick v. United States"
Results 1001 - 1020
of 2,102
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Mar 2008, 8:31 am
Ronald V. [read post]
26 Feb 2013, 12:58 pm
Google subsequently requested additional time to respond to Oracle's opening brief and these submissions.In my previous post on this case I summarized and quoted from the amicus curiae briefs of former Register of Copyrights of the United States Ralph Oman and three computer science and engineering professors. [read post]
22 Jun 2021, 11:08 am
United States, 435 U. [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 1:23 pm
For students outside the United States, university enrollment is acceptable.Professional CategoryAuthors may be legal practitioners, business professionals and/or academics. [read post]
22 May 2014, 5:00 am
Generally, government employees are immune from discovery in private litigation under rules first set out in United States ex rel. [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 4:37 pm
By Eric Goldman Farah v. [read post]
14 Sep 2010, 10:41 am
The United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit reversed the vacatur and remanded. [read post]
2 Sep 2013, 5:18 pm
Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) explains: In many Latin American countries, the term “notario publico” (for “notary public”) stands for something very different than what it means in the United States. [read post]
History Shows the Supreme Court Knows How to Move Quickly, as it Should With the Trump Immunity Case
22 Apr 2024, 5:50 am
United States. [read post]
15 May 2024, 10:07 pm
The United States and the private plaintiffs filed an opposition. [read post]
4 Aug 2022, 7:30 am
When it passed the Clean Water Act, Congress redefined the term to mean “waters of the United States. [read post]
1 Mar 2012, 2:36 pm
Rather, “only those actions by the claimant which have the purpose and effect of causing the United States to pay out money it is not obligated to pay, or those actions which intentionally deprive the United States of money it is lawfully due, are properly considered ‘claims’ within the meaning of the FCA. [read post]
9 Jun 2006, 5:49 am
United Kingdom, at paras. 46-49; repeated in Kalogeropoulou and Others v. [read post]
28 Jul 2018, 4:07 pm
In this post, we look at how different medical bodies, specifically those in Europe (the European Medicines Agency (EMA) ) and in the United States (the FDA) look at evidence that might be considered "clear and convincing. [read post]
3 Mar 2022, 6:51 am
The federal government’s arguments Assistant to the Solicitor General Michael Huston argued for the United States in support of Egbert. [read post]
15 Sep 2015, 1:57 pm
In Bateman v Mnemonics (1996), the court there stated that because fair use is a statutory doctrine, fair use is not an infringement. [read post]
9 Jan 2008, 11:05 am
"[9] Citing Will v. [read post]
10 Feb 2014, 1:57 pm
However, a name of a series of creative works can be registered with the United States Patent & Trademark Office (USPTO) under TMEP §1202.08(c). [read post]
16 Mar 2023, 11:59 am
From today's North Dakota Supreme Court decision in Wrigley v. [read post]
10 Dec 2015, 10:00 pm
Ltd. v. [read post]
