Search for: "Rules of Evidence v. Rules" Results 1001 - 1020 of 59,609
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 May 2024, 6:19 pm
Later on, during the industrialisation, it be-came evident that the latter might cause major damage: in this respect, a crucial refer-ence in French law remains until today in the imperial decree of 15 October 1810 “relatingto factories and workshops that spread an unhealthy or unpleasant odour” - as the firststep towards legislation on classified installations.But it was not until the 1970s that French legislation began to be seen as environmental,and a Ministry of the… [read post]
13 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
"Substantial evidence in this context means some credible evidence" (Matter of Maxwell v New York City Employees' Retirement Sys., 210 AD3d 1095, 1096 [internal quotation marks omitted]). [read post]
13 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
"Substantial evidence in this context means some credible evidence" (Matter of Maxwell v New York City Employees' Retirement Sys., 210 AD3d 1095, 1096 [internal quotation marks omitted]). [read post]
12 May 2024, 3:51 am by Annsley Merelle Ward
Relevant provisions on protecting confidential information in the UPC between the parties in the proceedings (Article 58 Unified Patent Court Agreement (UPCA) and Rule 262A Rules of Procedure (RoP)) Article 58 UPCA sets out the ground principles for the protection of confidential information in the UPC:“To protect the trade secrets, personal data or other confidential information of a party to the proceedings or of a third party, or to prevent an abuse of evidence,… [read post]
11 May 2024, 7:42 am by Mavrick Law Firm
The parol evidence rule is a substantive rule of law that limits the introduction of evidence to interpret the meaning of a contractual provision. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:01 am by Matthew A. Seligman
We begin with the framework that dominated the discussion at oral argument: the civil rule in the 1982 Supreme Court case of Nixon v. [read post]
10 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
We agree.It is well settled that "an arbitrator's rulings, unlike a trial court's, are largely unreviewable" (Matter of Falzone [New York Cent. [read post]
10 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
We agree.It is well settled that "an arbitrator's rulings, unlike a trial court's, are largely unreviewable" (Matter of Falzone [New York Cent. [read post]
10 May 2024, 2:30 am by Brian Cordery (Bristows)
This was made out on the evidence and therefore on a normal construction claim 1 would be infringed (we come onto validity shortly). [read post]