Search for: "STATE v RICHARDSON" Results 1001 - 1020 of 1,071
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Nov 2018, 7:32 pm by Schachtman
S5 (1990); Straus S, Richardson W, Glasziou P, Haynes R., Evidence-Based Medicine. [read post]
8 Jun 2018, 12:30 pm by Dan Ernst
  THURSDAY The Rights Revolution in Action: The Transformation of State Institutions after the 1960sThu, 6/7: 8:00 AM—9:45 AM, Sheraton Centre Toronto, Forest Hill ·         Chair/Discussant—Sara Mayeux, Vanderbilt University ·         Ingraham v. [read post]
23 Aug 2008, 1:23 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com]   Highlights this week included: DRM for streaming music dies a quiet death: (Electronic Frontier Foundation), (Techdirt) CAFC decides Apotex and Impax infringed AstraZeneca’s Prilosec patents: (Law360), (Patent Prospector), (Patent Docs), (GenericsWeb), CAFC upholds lower court’s decision finding USPTO was within its rights to subject a Cooper patent to… [read post]
11 Mar 2007, 3:17 am
Death penalty experts, moreover, note that of the five states allowing the death penalty for child rape, only one handed that sentence down. [read post]
14 Nov 2016, 6:16 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Richardson case involving utilitarian features, all dictated by functional purpose. [read post]
27 Mar 2015, 3:42 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
” The procedural changes to NLRB election procedures implemented by the quickie election rule place employers at a significant disadvantage when faced with a union demand for an election, Incorporating most of the procedures contained in a 2011 NLRB proposal previously invalidated by the District of Columbia’s district court in Chamber of Commerce of the United States v. [read post]
23 Feb 2015, 12:09 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
 ACA litigation, including King v Burwell Self-reporting ACA violations Other topics, including cafeteria plan elections, etc. [read post]
19 Feb 2012, 11:02 pm by Colin Murray
Article 2 of the ICESCR provides in terms that a state should take steps fully to realise the rights recognised in the Covenant “to the maximum of its available resources”. [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 5:36 am by Guest Author
This paper is much narrower—Sunstein is really unpacking some of the conservative SCOTUS bloc’s internal debates about the MQD in Biden v. [read post]
17 Sep 2015, 6:01 am by Administrator
Each Thursday we present a significant excerpt, usually from a recently published book or journal article. [read post]