Search for: "State v. Court of Appeals, Division I"
Results 1001 - 1020
of 4,097
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Jun 2022, 10:57 am
Decided on June 1, 2022 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department HECTOR D. [read post]
21 Aug 2007, 1:16 am
Woo's boorish behavior to make the decision seem more palatable (additional facts are contained in the prior, reversed decision by the Court of Appeals, Division I). [read post]
19 Dec 2016, 8:36 am
California v. [read post]
8 Nov 2007, 3:46 pm
In United States v. [read post]
28 Jun 2013, 4:05 am
Citing People v Weaver (12 NY3d 433) and United States v Jones (132 S Ct 945, the Court of Appeals ruled that the State's action was a search within the meaning of the State and Federal Constitutions but that under the relevant facts in this case “did not require a warrant. [read post]
13 Nov 2014, 5:00 am
Remember, Mississippi is an equitable distribution state whereby only marital property is subject to property division. [read post]
13 Nov 2014, 5:00 am
Remember, Mississippi is an equitable distribution state whereby only marital property is subject to property division. [read post]
19 Feb 2007, 10:21 am
Judge: "Defendants-Appellees raise numerous issues, which we consolidate as: I. [read post]
14 Apr 2015, 3:11 am
The Appellate Division noted that, “[a]lthough the Court of Appeals has not been confronted with the issue of whether works of art fall outside the ambit of the privacy statute, others courts that have addressed the issue have consistently found that they do,”citing as an example the 2002 Hoepker v. [read post]
29 May 2018, 5:12 pm
In Shine, the Court of Appeal (Second Appellate District, Division Four) reviewed de novo whether a demurrer to a reporting time pay complaint was properly sustained on res judicata grounds. [read post]
3 Aug 2016, 11:59 am
This post examines an opinion from the Court of Appeals of South Carolina: State v. [read post]
19 Jun 2009, 10:34 am
As always, the Court is saving some of the best—and, inevitably, most internally divisive—rulings for last.1 Here in the Commonwealth, we are eagerly awaiting the results of the most significant Massachusetts criminal case to reach the nation’s highest court this term: Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
4 Jun 2013, 11:22 am
Therese Keeley, the capable lawyer who tried the Landrigan case for the defense, had argued the appeal before the Appellate Division, but another lawyer, less familiar with the issues, argued for the defendant, in the Supreme Court. [read post]
20 Mar 2024, 9:01 pm
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit. [read post]
9 Jul 2007, 4:07 am
United States v. [read post]
13 Mar 2023, 4:00 am
Harper, in light of the North Carolina Supreme Court's decision to rehear the case from which Moore is an appeal. [read post]
24 Aug 2010, 8:33 am
On August 23, 2010, the Second District (Division One) issued an order changing the publication status of Gutierrez v. [read post]
14 Aug 2012, 8:48 am
The Plaintiff appealed. [read post]
14 Aug 2012, 8:54 am
The Plaintiff appealed. [read post]
2 Feb 2009, 4:15 am
"After taking the foregoing considerations into account, GOER concluded that Cushing was not required to perform out-of-title work.As judicial review of GOER's determination in this context is limited to whether it is arbitrary, capricious or without any rational, the court concluded that in "the absence of compelling evidence establishing that [Cushing] performed distinctive aspects of the NA1 job title that differentiated it from the N2 job title," there was no basis… [read post]
