Search for: "State v. David Harding" Results 1001 - 1020 of 1,855
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Aug 2014, 1:34 pm
 This provision requires that such exchanges be either state agencies or non-profits established by the state; for-profits and non-state entities need not apply. [read post]
7 Aug 2014, 12:21 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  Long and complex production chain for music, like other goods; hard for consumers to verify these claims. [read post]
1 Aug 2014, 2:54 am by Ben
The community of Kopimi requires no formal membership, although the Church is said to count around 3,000 members: Sacred symbols are CTRL+C and CTRL+V. [read post]
27 Jul 2014, 9:03 am by Schachtman
Over 20 years ago, in 1993, the United States Supreme Court handed down its Daubert decision. [read post]
23 Jul 2014, 6:31 am by Amy Howe
United States – it suggested that the “hypothetical jury” approach was in fact the correct one. [read post]
17 Jul 2014, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
And in situations like these, the Supreme Court has held, in a somewhat well-known 1977 case, Marks v. [read post]
29 Jun 2014, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
Courts can revisit their prior rulings, higher courts can change the legal landscape against which lower courts make decisions (as the Supreme Court in fact did in the immigration regulation setting in 2012 in Arizona v. [read post]
20 Jun 2014, 6:59 am
Finally, there's a lengthy analysis by David Musker of Kohler Mira v Bristan, a rare case on pecuniary and non-pecuniary relief for design infringement, on Class 99.Lex specialis. [read post]
5 Jun 2014, 8:11 am by Ben
It would be possible to design browsing software without an internet cache, but in the present state of technology the result would be that the internet would be unable to cope with current volumes of traffic and would not function properly. [read post]
5 Jun 2014, 4:36 am by Broc Romanek
Just in time for the SEC’s 80th birthday (tomorrow is 80 years since the ’34 Act was signed into law), comes this news from Paul Weiss (we will be posting memos in our “SEC Enforcement” Practice Area): Yesterday, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit issued a significant decision in SEC v. [read post]