Search for: "State v. Knight" Results 1001 - 1020 of 1,110
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 May 2011, 3:46 pm by Jon L. Gelman
” Although the Sherman Anti-trust Act had been passed in 1890, the United States Supreme Court decision of U.S. v. [read post]
10 Nov 2009, 12:46 pm by Steve Bainbridge
That trend was reversed following the Supreme Court’s decision in CTS Corp. v. [read post]
10 Jun 2022, 5:01 am by Mark MacCarthy
It accepts that the different policy goal, articulated in the Supreme Court’s Turner Broadcasting v. [read post]
7 Jun 2022, 5:00 pm by Michael Ehline
[Content Updated 06/08/2022] Most police officers and the public think the thin blue line will stand faithfully between private citizens and evildoers as modern-day Knights Templars of sorts. [read post]
16 Jul 2022, 1:00 am by David Pocklington
In his ruling on A & Anor, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for Health [2014] EWHC 1364 (Admin) Mr Justice King held that the claimant, whose ordinary/usual residence was in Northern Ireland, was not entitled to access in England abortion services free of charge. (13 May 2014). [read post]
10 Jun 2011, 1:32 pm by Kevin LaCroix
 He comes in like a medieval knight, girded for battle. [read post]
10 Feb 2014, 3:35 pm by Schachtman
“Recognizing that special interests are engaged in a campaign to extend Daubert’s reach to those states that have not embraced prescriptive definitions of scientific reliability. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  To a political scientist, one way is by viewing it as a power play by the rabbinate, an attempt many centuries before the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Cooper v Aaron to engage in a performative utterance establishing themselves as the “ultimate interpreters” of the document in question, whether the Torah or the Constitution. [read post]
15 Feb 2011, 3:32 am by SHG
RESOLVED, That the American Bar Association urges federal, state, territorial, tribal, and local courts  to adopt a procedure whereby  a criminal trial court shall, at a reasonable time prior to a criminal trial, disseminate to the prosecution and defense a written checklist delineating in detail the general disclosure obligations of the prosecution under Brady  v. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 6:05 am by Nicholas Noe
The Supreme Court’s 2010 decision in Holder v. [read post]
23 Aug 2010, 12:00 am
Similarly, if someone’s cat does not roam outdoors, it can remain unaltered.SB 250 does not cost the state any money. [read post]
12 Feb 2018, 4:00 am by Josh Blackman
In the Barnett/Blackman constitutional law casebook, we included this introduction to United States v. [read post]