Search for: "State v. Steele" Results 1001 - 1020 of 2,039
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 May 2023, 8:21 am by Unknown
For example, in the securities law context, a Second Circuit panel upheld the SEC’s Regulation Best Interest, but only after finding that a private plaintiff—not the state plaintiffs—had Article III standing (See, XY Planning Network, LLC v. [read post]
21 Sep 2018, 8:33 am by Wolfgang Demino
" Coast to Coast Energy, Inc. v Gasarch,149 AD3d 485, 486 (1st Dept 2017) (citations omitted); see also Cotia (USA) Ltd. v Lynn Steel Corp. [read post]
17 Sep 2014, 11:00 am
See Related Blog Posts:Concussions and Other Head Injuries in Youth SoccerNalwa v. [read post]
3 Apr 2024, 7:34 pm by Badrinath Srinivasan
 (ii) Development of Green Hydrogen Projects inside the Hubs in an integrated manner to allow pooling of resources and achievement of scale (iii) Enhance the cost-competitiveness of Green Hydrogen and its derivatives vis-a-vis fossil-based alternatives (iv) Maximize production of Green Hydrogen and its derivatives in India within the stated financial support (v) Encourage large-scale utilization and exports of Green Hydrogen and its derivatives (vi)… [read post]
11 Aug 2021, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
" However, said the Commissioner, the "does not affect my conclusion that petitioners’ claims here — such as the disparate impact of hiring practices like “word of mouth” referrals – are more appropriately resolved by a fair employment practice agency or a court of competent jurisdiction," citing Grant v Bethlehem Steel Corp., 635 F2d 1007. [read post]
11 Aug 2021, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
" However, said the Commissioner, the "does not affect my conclusion that petitioners’ claims here — such as the disparate impact of hiring practices like “word of mouth” referrals – are more appropriately resolved by a fair employment practice agency or a court of competent jurisdiction," citing Grant v Bethlehem Steel Corp., 635 F2d 1007. [read post]
7 Jan 2025, 11:00 pm by Michael C. Dorf
He explained how the concurrence in Bush v. [read post]
9 Aug 2019, 7:47 am by Chris Attig
Senior Judge Hagel of the US Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims – an Article I Federal Appellate Court – compares attorneys to greedy bottom-feeders in his dissenting poem in Young v. [read post]
9 Aug 2019, 7:47 am by Chris Attig
Senior Judge Hagel of the US Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims – an Article I Federal Appellate Court – compares attorneys to greedy bottom-feeders in his dissenting poem in Young v. [read post]
10 Nov 2019, 6:12 pm by HowardGutman
District Court for the Southern District of Florida, Miami – Weiss, et al., v. [read post]
21 Apr 2014, 5:00 pm by Eric Goldman
State AGs are trying to find backdoor ways to pursue alleged copyright infringement. [read post]