Search for: "Strong v. United States" Results 1001 - 1020 of 7,088
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
Issacharoff on Political Corruption
23 Aug 2010, 5:26 am by Lawrence Solum
Citizens United categorically rejected the rationale of Austin v. [read post]
Legal Theory Blog - http://lsolum.typepad.com/legaltheory/
Second Circuit Notes Split with Ninth Circuit Over Whether Failure to Make Adequate Disclosures Under Item 303 of Regulation S-K May Serve as Basis for a Section 10(b) Claim
26 Jan 2015, 10:42 am by John Stigi
In Stratte-McClure v. [read post]
Corporate Securities Law Blog - http://www.corporatesecuritieslawblog.com/
Argument Preview: Tellabs v. Makor on 3/28
27 Mar 2007, 9:03 pm
v. [read post]
SCOTUSblog - http://www.scotusblog.com/
May an Officer Search a Vehicle Incident to an Arrest for DWI?
6 Mar 2017, 3:00 am by Jeff Welty
It began by discussing the prior case of State v. [read post]
North Carolina Criminal Law Blog - http://nccriminallaw.sog.unc.edu/
May an Officer Search a Vehicle Incident to an Arrest for DWI?
6 Mar 2017, 3:00 am by Jeff Welty
It began by discussing the prior case of State v. [read post]
North Carolina Criminal Law Blog - http://nccriminallaw.sog.unc.edu/
A User’s Guide to Trump v. Anderson, Part Seven: Trump’s Two Remaining “Off-Ramp” Arguments: (i) That Colorado has Implemented a De Facto Extraconstitutional Presidential Qualification, in Violation of Term Limits v. Thornton; and (ii) That Colorado has Abused its Article II Authority to Appoint Presidential Electors in a “Manner” of Appointment that Colorado Law Doesn’t Authorize
7 Feb 2024, 2:02 pm by Marty Lederman
Term Limits v. [read post]
Balkinization - http://balkin.blogspot.com/
A User’s Guide to Trump v. Anderson, Part Seven: Trump’s Two Remaining “Off-Ramp” Arguments: (i) That Colorado has Implemented a De Facto Extraconstitutional Presidential Qualification, in Violation of Term Limits v. Thornton; and (ii) That Colorado has Abused its Article II Authority to Appoint Presidential Electors in a “Manner” of that Colorado Law Doesn’t Authorize
7 Feb 2024, 2:35 pm by Marty Lederman
Term Limits v. [read post]
Balkinization - http://balkin.blogspot.com/
D.C. Court Dismisses Case Alleging Interference With Business Expectancy For Failure To Name Names
18 Jun 2009, 3:13 pm
A recent decision from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia highlights the importance of pleading specific facts in support of unfair business practices claims to survive a Motion to Dismiss. [read post]
Unfair Business Practices - http://unfairbusinesspractices.blogspot.com/
Ninth Circuit Affirms Rule 702 Exclusion of Dr David Egilman in Diacetyl Case
20 Jun 2011, 3:02 pm by Schachtman
On June 17, 2011, the Ninth Circuit of the United States Court of Appeals affirmed a district judge’s decision to exclude Dr David S. [read post]
Tortini - http://schachtmanlaw.com/blog/
MIAMI BUSINESS LITIGATION: CORPORATE OFFICERS AND THE BUSINESS JUDGMENT RULE
3 Feb 2024, 4:57 am by Mavrick Law Firm
The business judgment rule is a critical feature of the law governing corporations throughout the United States. [read post]
Florida Business Litigation Lawyer Blog - https://www.mavricklaw.com/blog/
Most Important United States Supreme Court Case in Refugee Law: I.N.S. v. Elias-Zacarias
3 Dec 2010, 9:02 am by Jessica E. Slavin
Stevic and INS v. [read post]
Faculty Blog - http://law.marquette.edu/facultyblog/
Can’t Wait to Grow Up? Not So Fast! – New Jersey Appellate Division Reviews Emancipated Child’s Request for College Contribution From Parents
12 Feb 2017, 7:58 am by Elsie Gonzalez, Esq.
Supreme Court decisions regarding the fundamental right to parent one’s child, he wrote:  “United States Supreme Court Justice Sandra Day O’Connor wrote on behalf of the Court in the case of Troxel v. [read post]
New Jersey Divorce and Family Lawyer Blog - http://www.newjerseydivorcelawyer-blog.com/
US Supreme Court's Bombshell Opinion in Stern v. Marshall Draws the Line Against Incremental Erosion of Article III Judicial Power
24 Jun 2011, 1:50 am
United States, 116 U.S. 616 (1886). [read post]
Bankruptcy Litigation Blog - http://www.bankruptcylitigationblog.com/
Why the European Commission’s Proposal for Russian State Asset Seizure Should be Abandoned
23 Mar 2023, 5:55 am by Eleanor Runde
And, in Dames & Moore v. [read post]
Just Security - https://www.justsecurity.org/
Is US defamation law’s “actual malice” requirement still fit for purpose? – Georgia Scarr
18 Sep 2021, 6:39 am by INFORRM
United States defamation law has made it famously difficult for claimants to win their cases. [read post]
Inforrm's Blog - https://inforrm.wordpress.com/
Wal-Mart v. Dukes: Implications For Antitrust Class Actions
11 Jul 2011, 11:52 am by Sheppard Mullin
On June 20, 2011, the United States Supreme Court decided Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
Antitrust Law Blog - http://www.antitrustlawblog.com/
Symposium: Surprising unanimity, even more surprising clarity
26 Jun 2014, 8:02 am by Adam Gershowitz
California and United States v. [read post]
SCOTUSblog - http://www.scotusblog.com/
Apple v. Samsung: stark contrast between Supreme Court and Federal Circuit
13 Oct 2016, 12:02 pm by Florian Mueller
Within a few days of each other, the Supreme Court of the United States and the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit had Apple v. [read post]
FOSS Patents - http://www.fosspatents.com
DOMA headed to the Supreme Court?
16 Jul 2012, 11:49 am by Jessica Monaco, ACLU
United States, doesn’t have an appeals court decision yet. [read post]
American Civil Liberties Union Blog - http://blog.aclu.org/blog
Arlington v. FCC: What it Means for Net Neutrality
24 May 2013, 10:34 am by Steve Schultze
This takes us back to a case in 2005, NCTA v. [read post]
Freedom to Tinker - https://freedom-to-tinker.com/