Search for: "TECHNICAL PRODUCTS COMPANY, INC." Results 1001 - 1020 of 1,404
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Apr 2014, 2:26 pm by Lyle Denniston
Aside from struggling somewhat to learn just how this new entry in home entertainment actually works, the hour-long hearing in American Broadcasting Companies, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Aug 2019, 3:51 am by Michael H Cohen
FTC WINS ADVERTISEMENT SUBSTANTIATION CASE AGAINST ONLINE MARKETER OF HEALTH PRODUCTS The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) won a $2.2 million judgment against health food marketer Wellness Support Network, Inc. [read post]
5 Dec 2008, 3:00 pm
  France Paris Appeal Court: Che Guevara’s portrait: an icon, not a trade mark (Class 46)   Germany German banks move towards deal on patent collateralisation (IAM) Munich Regional Court dismisses actor/comedian Michael ‘Bully’ Herbig’s trade mark and personality rights infringement case against Take Two Interactive over ‘Bully – Die Ehrenrunde’ computer game (Class 46) Polar bear Knut and the ‘big… [read post]
1 May 2024, 10:16 pm by The White Law Group
Additionally, Kabir Sethi, LPL’s managing director and chief product officer, departed from the company on March 31, 2024. [read post]
17 Jan 2008, 7:55 am
Liggett Group, Inc., 505 U.S. 504 (1992) (holding that state common law torts were something that was subject to preemption), Medtronic, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Aug 2013, 4:00 am by Administrator
J Pereira Fernandes SA is a Portuguese company that supplied bedding products in July 2002 to Bedcare (UK) Limited, a company of which Mr Mehta was a director. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 3:00 am by Peter A. Mahler
The trial court agreed with the company on both issues and dismissed the complaint. [read post]
4 Nov 2013, 9:46 am by Jane Chong
 Part 2 argues that the technical difficulty of developing minimally bug-ridden software actually weighs in favor of, rather than against, a liability regime. [read post]
12 Oct 2017, 4:22 pm by INFORRM
The Commission’s faith in machines or algorithms as arbiters of fundamental rights is not shared by technical experts. [read post]
10 Dec 2016, 11:31 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Jeffrey-Allan Indus., Inc., 807 F.2d 955, 962 (Fed. [read post]
12 Jun 2007, 9:53 am
NCT Group, Inc., 863 A.2d 772, 795-96 (2004). [read post]
2 Nov 2011, 4:53 am
The Kat had this brilliant idea for what you get when you cross 'Neutrokine-a' with 'genome' Hot off the press and not yet digested, this morning's ruling of the United Kingdom's Supreme Court in Human Genome Sciences Inc. v Eli Lilly and Company [2011] UKSC 51, will be the subject of considerable analysis in the coming days and weeks. [read post]
27 Nov 2018, 9:30 am by Ronald Mann
While Helsinn was developing the product, it entered into a marketing agreement with another company in which it disclosed information about the pharmaceutical but required the other company to keep the information confidential. [read post]