Search for: "W Smith" Results 1001 - 1020 of 3,103
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Dec 2017, 10:00 pm
Tom Marino (R-PA), and co-sponsored by representatives Doug Collins (R-GA), Lamar Smith (R-TX), Judy Chu (D-CA), and Ted Lieu (D-CA). [read post]
11 Dec 2017, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
Thus, the rule of Smith, not RFRA, applies in the Masterpiece Cakeshop case. [read post]
10 Dec 2017, 3:03 am by Edward Smith
Avoiding Accidents with Stranded Vehicles I’m Ed Smith, a Sacramento Car Accident Lawyer. [read post]
28 Nov 2017, 9:48 am by Ronald Mann
… [W]hat are the procedures that are here that you think make this essentially adjudicatory that are not in those other proceedings[?] [read post]
19 Nov 2017, 1:32 pm by Smita Ghosh
Douglas Smith covers Laura Engelstein’s Russia in Flames: War, Revolution, Civil War, 1914–1921, which is “likely to become a standard work” on Revolutionary Russia, and Anne Applebaum’s Red Famine: Stalin’s War on Ukraine, the “definitive history of Stalin’s famine” and its impact on Ukranian nationhood. [read post]
13 Nov 2017, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
, (Georgia Journal of International and Comparative Law, Vol. 45, No. 1, 2016).Luke W. [read post]
8 Nov 2017, 10:16 am by Jo Dale Carothers
  Instead, “[w]hen an issue arises before [the] PTAB, Administrative Law Judges make legal determinations as to which communications may be protected from disclosure on a case-by-case basis, based on the Federal Rules of Evidence and common law. [read post]
4 Nov 2017, 4:13 am by Garrett Hinck
Bruce Ackerman summarized oral arguments in Smith v. [read post]
3 Nov 2017, 5:47 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
"[W]hen public employees make statements pursuant to their official duties, the employees are not speaking as citizens for First Amendment purposes, and the Constitution does not insulate their communications from employer discipline. [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 4:09 am by Edith Roberts
Smith, in which the justices summarily ordered Arkansas to provide names of same-sex partners on birth certificates, calling the case “important for what it tells us about what the Court meant in Obergefell. [read post]