Search for: "We Don't Judge - We Defend"
Results 1001 - 1020
of 6,905
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Jun 2016, 6:17 am
If you don't know what I'm talking about, then you probably don't have a client who has been enhanced under the Armed Career Criminal Act or the Career Offender guidelines. [read post]
10 Aug 2007, 7:37 am
We don't do that stuff here. [read post]
22 Dec 2008, 12:19 pm
If you practice law in Broward (something we strongly recommend against) you've invariably come upon that situation where the in court prosecutor sheepishly admits they don't have a case but their supervisors won't let them dismiss it. [read post]
1 Nov 2007, 10:09 am
I don't know where it will end. [read post]
7 Jan 2010, 8:05 am
We've seen this who's-your-daddy stunt before, and we don't think it's a good idea. [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 12:39 pm
I too don't like it when the government files criminal charges against someone who's not guilty of anything. [read post]
13 Jul 2009, 12:49 am
In the spring we'd make meat helmets. [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 8:33 am
I don't think it did that. [read post]
16 Sep 2009, 7:15 am
Baltimore city judges are simply trying to weed out our services because they don't believe in our purpose. [read post]
1 Jul 2009, 6:44 pm
I don't have any inside information on the TABC Rainbow club raid. [read post]
17 Nov 2020, 11:23 am
Obama, EFF Explains Why Metadata Matters and the Third-Party Doctrine Doesn’t (EFF) NSA Spying (EFF’s landing page re NSA spying and their use of metadata) EFF cases in relation to NSA spying and metadata in order of file date: Hepting v AT&T Jewel v NSA First Unitarian v NSA Smith v Obama Win! [read post]
16 Jul 2024, 12:08 am
The Erlinger majority ( this part of the opinion is agreed on by 6 justices) basically says that Almendarez-Torres is probably wrong but nobody asked them to overrule it and they don't need to overrule it in this case so they won't at this time. [read post]
4 Dec 2014, 5:14 am
" But when asylum seekers reach our borders following that beacon, they and many others are deported quickly to danger, without a hearing, often after signing deportation forms they don't understand and in a language they don't speak. [read post]
9 Aug 2007, 4:43 pm
He argued that the lawyers have no proof that their communications were intercepted and therefore don't have a case. [read post]
19 Apr 2015, 10:10 am
Judge Morris also points out that the injuries alleged don’t conclusively establish that we’re within the exclusion, and thus the insurer would at least have a duty to defend (in case you’re not familiar with this general idea, if there’s even potential coverage of a claim, the insurer has a duty to defend). [read post]
5 May 2023, 5:02 am
Robinson's column doesn't even deal with this issue. [read post]
2 Apr 2011, 11:58 am
I don't know Rakofsky, never heard of him before. [read post]
26 Mar 2007, 11:21 pm
We see the "symmetry" in the court's rules requiring proof to a "legal certainty" in both situations, but we don't see the logic. [read post]
9 Sep 2015, 7:14 am
This morning Chief Judge Carnes issued this opinion. [read post]
10 Apr 2024, 2:01 pm
A party can't remove a lawsuit from its home state in a diversity suit, but there's an exception for parties that are not yet served (because we don't want sham unserved parties to prevent removal). [read post]
