Search for: "Burden v. Burden"
Results 1021 - 1040
of 30,953
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 May 2019, 4:00 am
" In the words of the Appellate Division, " Supreme Court correctly held that [the agency] failed to meet its burden of showing that the intra-agency materials exemption applies, and properly directed [the agency] to produce an unredacted copy of the subject report. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 9:00 pm
Matter of Davids v City of New York, 2010 NY Slip Op 03247, Decided on April 22, 2010, Appellate Division, First Department Joseph Davids was demoted* from the rank of probationary captain to his permanent title of lieutenant Davids filed... [read post]
30 Jun 2016, 5:06 am
Livingston Christian Schools v Genoa Charter Township, 2016 WL 3549337 (ED MI 6/30/2016) Filed under: Current Caselaw, RLUIPA [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 4:32 pm
Thornton and Cook v. [read post]
17 Apr 2012, 5:44 am
" This language comes from Mosansky v. [read post]
16 Oct 2009, 5:56 am
Only tangentially relevant to housing law, but R v Charles [2009] EWCA Crim 1570 is a decision of the Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) dealing with the question of burden of proof for a “reasonable excuse” defence when charged with breaching an ASBO. [read post]
11 May 2018, 8:29 am
In Chai v. [read post]
5 Sep 2011, 3:45 am
United States v. [read post]
13 Apr 2016, 4:00 am
A party challenging a rule or regulation adopted by a State agency has the heavy burden of showing that the regulation was unreasonable and unsupported by any evidenceNew York State Corr. [read post]
21 Jul 2023, 1:42 pm
The unanimous opinion in Groff v. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 4:10 am
In Apache Stronghold v. [read post]
14 Jul 2014, 10:02 am
"As to burdens of proof, the Third Circuit last addressed the Sell-specific standard of review in United States v. [read post]
28 Jul 2015, 11:40 pm
Burwell (10th Cir., July 14, 2015) (Requiring religious NPOs to opt out of contraceptive coverage for employees does not substantially burden religious exercise under RFRA nor infringe 1st amendment rights)Southern Nazarene University v. [read post]
2 Jan 2008, 6:00 am
In Bell v. [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 5:45 pm
United States v Sandoval Gonzalez, 9th Circuit, April 25, 2011. [read post]
8 Jun 2007, 3:19 pm
State v. [read post]
7 Mar 2010, 8:00 am
The court held that the burden with which he challenges was imposed on him because of a valid contract which he voluntarily entered.In Peterman v. [read post]
16 Feb 2012, 3:59 pm
In Duart v. [read post]
20 Dec 2010, 6:16 am
In Martinez v. [read post]
30 May 2018, 4:02 pm
In Adidas America, Inc. v. [read post]
