Search for: "California Employment Law Letter"
Results 1021 - 1040
of 1,869
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 May 2009, 1:42 pm
While California may have more cases of foreclosure, they are spread out over a larger area. [read post]
26 Oct 2007, 8:38 am
Under an SEC rule instituted in 2000, executives can sell stock on a planned basis without violating insider trading laws. [read post]
9 Aug 2021, 6:15 am
Thus, even if Great American moves for summary judgment based on a more developed record, it may not be able to meet its high burden to demonstrate that the exclusion clearly, explicitly, and unambiguously applies to the claim, as required under California law. [read post]
29 Jan 2020, 9:26 am
Signed into law in 2010, and largely upheld by the U.S. [read post]
26 Apr 2012, 12:20 pm
But Ginsburg says the law had roots in a California effort to require pregnancy or childbirth leave to women: The California law sharply divided women’s rights advocates. [read post]
12 Jan 2024, 6:44 am
About Sheppard Mullin: Sheppard Mullin is a full service Am Law 50 firm with over 1000 attorneys in 16 offices located throughout California and in Chicago, Dallas, Houston, New York, Washington, D.C., Brussels, London, Seoul and Shanghai. [read post]
6 Dec 2019, 12:51 pm
California was the first in the country to sign such a law. [read post]
10 Oct 2016, 5:01 pm
A September 26, 2016 memo from the California Bankers Association (here) details the specifics of these demand letters recently sent to community banks. [read post]
19 Feb 2007, 12:54 pm
However, due to preemption by federal law, civil union partners and domestic partners have no legal basis to claim spousal benefits from non-governmental employers, but such employers can extend benefits voluntarily, subject to the adverse tax consequences imposed by federal law. [read post]
12 Sep 2023, 3:22 pm
However, the letter did not define what undercover included, among other errors. [read post]
4 Apr 2023, 12:35 pm
However, the letter did not define what undercover included, among other errors. [read post]
14 Sep 2007, 9:31 am
Currently, there are three public law schools in Northern California (Hastings, Davis, Boalt Hall at Berkeley) and only one in Southern California (UCLA). [read post]
4 Dec 2011, 9:00 pm
Miller alleges he was terminated after expressing support for marijuana decriminalization in a LEAP letter (although his employer states that he had not made sufficiently clear in the letter that he was speaking on his own behalf (he disputes that), and for allegedly dishonestly denying signing onto the LEAP letter (he says that at the time he had not known his wife signed his name to the letter, but then supported it)). [read post]
27 Dec 2011, 7:09 am
Effective, January 1, 2012, California will require more information be contained in breach notification letters following a breach of personal information, including what happened, how it may affect the recipient of the letter, and how the recipient can protect themselves. [read post]
10 Aug 2022, 8:54 am
Filing a Complaint against your Brokerage Firm The White Law Group is investigating potential securities claims involving financial advisor Robin Taliaferro and the liability his employers may have for failure to properly supervise him. [read post]
8 Nov 2015, 9:30 pm
Title VII, as well as California anti-discrimination laws like the Fair Employment and Housing Act and the Unruh Civil Rights Act, prohibits sex-based discrimination. [read post]
10 Jul 2013, 12:44 pm
We offer free consultations and can meet you after hours or on Saturdays, at your home, hospital, place of employment. [read post]
16 Dec 2015, 9:26 am
Employers operating in the U.S. should also consider strategic use of mandatory forum selection and choice-of-law provisions in restrictive covenant agreements with U.S. [read post]
18 Dec 2014, 9:17 am
The employer hears unsubstantiated gossip about that list copying, but does not investigate based on the flimsy evidence and for fear of violating the privacy law. [read post]
29 Oct 2010, 9:18 am
The trial court recognized that the California Supreme Court had granted review of two cases to decide whether California law required employers to ensure employees take meal breaks, or if the proper standard was that employers need only provide employees with the opportunity to take such breaks. [read post]
