Search for: "California v. United States"
Results 1021 - 1040
of 12,561
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 May 2015, 6:30 am
United States, and Yates v. [read post]
28 Sep 2012, 7:08 am
In reaching its conclusion, the Court of Appeals relied on the April 2011 United States Supreme Court’s landmark decision in AT&T Mobility, LLC v. [read post]
13 Jan 2010, 6:58 am
United States. [read post]
2 May 2017, 7:19 am
"[Defendant] imports into the United States the seeds developed from the breeding activities in Spain. [read post]
23 Jul 2023, 3:11 pm
” (State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. [read post]
30 Aug 2021, 8:55 am
Flo & Eddie, Inc. v. [read post]
29 May 2012, 12:46 pm
United States, No. 11-1395, which seeks review of CAAF’s decision in United States v. [read post]
16 Dec 2019, 5:56 pm
MARTIN SAN FRANCISCO, December 16 – Today, the United States Supreme Court declined to review City of Boise v. [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 1:25 pm
The respondents then attempted to satisfy the judgment by attaching accounts in the United States held by (among others) Bank Melli. [read post]
7 Dec 2010, 2:38 am
The United States District Court for the Northern District of California certified a class of all women with claims for injunctive relief, declaratory relief, and back pay employed by Wal-Mart at any time after December 26, 1998, and created a separate opt-out class for punitive damages claims. [read post]
8 Jan 2010, 2:27 pm
The case is State v. [read post]
14 Oct 2010, 1:01 pm
In California and in line of sight is LOTUS. [read post]
21 Jul 2016, 12:14 pm
Unit Owners Ass’n v. 1815A St., Condo. [read post]
9 Jun 2015, 8:15 am
They sued the United States in Federal Court. [read post]
8 Feb 2011, 4:44 am
United States v. [read post]
28 Jan 2013, 6:36 am
On January 23, 2013, a group of major universities and technology transfer offices filed an amicus brief urging the United States Supreme Court to affirm the Federal Circuit in Monsanto v. [read post]
22 Feb 2010, 6:00 am
However, the validity of the California decision has been questioned by the 2008 United States Supreme Court’s ruling, which held that a defendant had a right to demand live testimony at trial from crime lab technicians who actually performed their tests. [read post]
14 Feb 2011, 5:00 am
On May 15, 2006, the United States Supreme Court decided the Sereboff v. [read post]
28 Mar 2010, 8:26 pm
The Idaho case is State v. [read post]
16 Jun 2015, 7:32 am
In California Building Industry Association v. [read post]
