Search for: "Court of Appeals, 5th District"
Results 1021 - 1040
of 5,148
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Jan 2021, 3:00 am
(C071785; 39 Cal.App.5th 708; Yolo County Superior Court; CVCV091258.) [read post]
9 Jan 2021, 5:37 pm
The Court adopted the findings of the court below, the Third District Court of Appeal, which held as follows: “the statute’s disparate treatment of medical malpractice wrongful deaths does bear a rational relationship to the legitimate state interest of ensuring the accessibility of medical care to Florida residents by curtailing the skyrocketing medical malpractice insurance premiums in Florida. [read post]
8 Jan 2021, 12:04 pm
Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit does not allow Section 1983 suits when the government actor did not cause the harm, but only created the danger of violence by others. [read post]
8 Jan 2021, 10:13 am
This case disagrees with the really not great In re Austin J. case and is from the same appellate district. [read post]
6 Jan 2021, 4:47 pm
The trial court denied the petition and the District appealed. [read post]
4 Jan 2021, 11:21 am
Co., No. 19-20779 (5th Cir. [read post]
4 Jan 2021, 11:21 am
Co., No. 19-20779 (5th Cir. [read post]
1 Jan 2021, 7:55 am
Colin filed this appeal in which he contended that the district court erroneously applied a “shared intent” standard for determining the habitual residence of the children instead of a “totality of the circumstances” standard. [read post]
31 Dec 2020, 11:12 am
” 497 F.2d 67 (5th Cir. 1974). [read post]
31 Dec 2020, 11:12 am
” 497 F.2d 67 (5th Cir. 1974). [read post]
31 Dec 2020, 2:00 am
Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit (which covers Texas, Louisiana, and Mississippi employers) recently ruled, affirming the district court’s decision. [read post]
30 Dec 2020, 4:27 pm
(C071785; 39 Cal.App.5th 708; Yolo County Superior Court; CVCV091258.) [read post]
28 Dec 2020, 11:47 am
., 19-20779, 2020 WL 7487067 (5th Cir. [read post]
23 Dec 2020, 12:16 pm
Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit stayed that order while prison officials appealed. [read post]
23 Dec 2020, 8:01 am
And earlier this year, on February 13, 2020, the District of Columbia Court of Appeals essentially made the same finding in Diamond v. [read post]
22 Dec 2020, 1:52 pm
Plaintiff appealed the district court’s decision contending that, as a matter of law, a Jones Act seaman may not be held contributorily negligent when carrying out an order. [read post]
22 Dec 2020, 8:28 am
District Court Judge Sarah Vance addressed each of Douglas’ claims individually. [read post]
22 Dec 2020, 8:28 am
District Court Judge Sarah Vance addressed each of Douglas’ claims individually. [read post]
16 Dec 2020, 3:00 am
The district court granted summary judgment and Appellants appealed. [read post]
15 Dec 2020, 10:12 pm
Court of Appeal, Fourth District, Division 2, California. [read post]
