Search for: "D. PIERCE" Results 1021 - 1040 of 1,187
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Apr 2007, 6:05 am
And the Constitution of the United States affirmatively protects it.There it is, on pages 25-26 of the slip opinion: "Respondents have not shown that requiring doctors to intend dismemberment before delivery to an anatomical landmark will prohibit the vast majority of D&E abortions. [read post]
15 Sep 2019, 9:00 am by Michael H Cohen
When I got off the bus, I was back in my normal 3-D body, I was a regular person, preoccupied and worried about the next transportation change, and I was out of the experience. [read post]
16 Feb 2016, 10:26 am by Chris McLaughlin
Unfortunately for Maggio, the state judicial ethics board had little difficulty piercing the veil of his pseudonym and permanently barring him from serving as a judge. [read post]
27 Feb 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
Importantly in the court’s analysis, the court found it plausible that Moments’ value was derived from the continued operation by Dapper Labs of the Flow Blockchain, stating that “[w]ithout Dapper Labs’s continued maintenance of the Flow Blockchain and the ‘token that powers it all,’” plaintiffs “plausibly allege[d] that Moments would have no value. [read post]
8 Dec 2020, 5:01 pm
Embassy in Cuba was awakened one night at home in Havana in 2016 by severe pain and a sensation of intense pressure in the face, a loud piercing sound in one ear with directional features, and acute disequilibrium and nausea. [read post]
3 Nov 2022, 10:45 am by Mark Ashton
On June 24, 2022, the United States Supreme Court reversed its 1973 decision in Roe v. [read post]
24 Feb 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  Later the same year the even more conservative and inflexible Pierce Butler replaced the moderate William R. [read post]
25 Dec 2017, 9:40 pm by The Regulatory Review
The Regulatory Review is pleased to highlight our top fifty regulatory essays of 2017 authored by outside contributors. [read post]
25 Dec 2017, 9:40 pm by The Regulatory Review
The Regulatory Review is pleased to highlight our top fifty regulatory essays of 2017 authored by outside contributors. [read post]
28 Jan 2014, 3:36 pm by Marty Lederman
  As a quick perusal confirms, most of those amicus briefs are devoted to the question of whether for-profit corporations have “consciences,” or can exercise religion--which is also the first question discussed in the government’s opening brief in Hobby Lobby.I am dubious about this focus on the “corporate religious exercise” question; it is, I think, something of a diversion from what’s truly at stake in these cases, and the Court has no need to issue any… [read post]