Search for: "Driver v. State"
Results 1021 - 1040
of 11,131
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Dec 2016, 2:05 pm
’ United States v. [read post]
27 Oct 2017, 2:40 pm
The Georgia Department of Transportation v. [read post]
14 Jan 2016, 6:38 am
Because the drivers failed to show they were entitled to wages from the employer, their argument that it made improper deductions from wages by requiring them to pay fees and expenses failed as a matter of law (Enger v. [read post]
4 Mar 2015, 5:02 am
Citing People v Weaver (12 NY3d 433) and United States v Jones (132 S Ct 945}, the Court of Appeals ruled that the State agency's action was a search within the meaning of the State and Federal Constitutions and “did not require a warrant” but “on the facts of this case such surveillance was unreasonable”The decision TLC decision is posted on the Internet… [read post]
2 May 2015, 9:21 am
Additional Resources: Los Angeles, Long Beach ports truck drivers walk off job over wages, employee status, April 27, 2015, ABC 7 News Los Angeles More Blog Entries: Adams v. [read post]
12 May 2012, 5:01 am
State v. [read post]
27 Jun 2020, 6:28 am
Driver Challenges Hit-Skip Conviction The recent decision in State v. [read post]
3 May 2014, 4:55 pm
Reilly v. [read post]
2 Oct 2014, 9:57 am
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit held in United States v. [read post]
13 Nov 2014, 6:55 pm
Witt - Suppression granted where stop based on driver high beams on;• State v. [read post]
24 Aug 2020, 6:51 am
In Rittmann v. [read post]
27 May 2016, 6:24 am
Additional Resources: Trotter v. [read post]
14 Aug 2010, 11:58 am
The 10th Circuit relied on New Mexico law citing Ovecka v. [read post]
7 Jun 2011, 4:21 am
Darrow v. [read post]
13 May 2015, 5:00 pm
Additional Resources: Coffey v. [read post]
24 Feb 2016, 5:20 am
The First Circuit had grappled with much of this in its 2014 decision in Massachusetts Delivery Ass’n v. [read post]
8 Dec 2009, 7:33 pm
New York State courts have adopted a rule known as "the Noseworthy Doctrine" (first established in the case of Noseworthy v City of New York, 298 NY 76), which permits the jury to draw an inference in favor of the dead victim of a car accident such as this one. [read post]
8 Dec 2009, 7:33 pm
New York State courts have adopted a rule known as "the Noseworthy Doctrine" (first established in the case of Noseworthy v City of New York, 298 NY 76), which permits the jury to draw an inference in favor of the dead victim of a car accident such as this one. [read post]
11 Apr 2016, 4:49 pm
Mehta & Partners PLLC Cyrus Mehta offers federal preemption as a potential basis for upholding President Obama's expanded deferred action program in United States v. [read post]
