Search for: "FAIR v. THE STATE"
Results 1021 - 1040
of 30,463
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Aug 2018, 6:05 am
Casey v. [read post]
16 Feb 2015, 11:12 am
Pointing to the Michigan Department of State Police v. [read post]
7 Apr 2009, 6:00 pm
Spencer v. [read post]
22 Oct 2018, 2:00 am
Supreme Court on the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) in a case interpreting the state’s comparable wage regulations. [read post]
22 Oct 2018, 2:00 am
Supreme Court on the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) in a case interpreting the state’s comparable wage regulations. [read post]
6 May 2013, 9:53 am
In Sanchez v. [read post]
29 Sep 2010, 9:38 am
In Bateman v. [read post]
1 Jul 2009, 5:15 am
Nevertheless, there was a development in Cambridge University Press, et al. v. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 10:49 am
“State and local governments that thought fair-share provisions furthered their interests will need to find new ways of managing their workforces. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 10:49 am
“State and local governments that thought fair-share provisions furthered their interests will need to find new ways of managing their workforces. [read post]
26 Feb 2021, 1:45 am
This means that her appeal cannot be fair and effective. [read post]
11 Jun 2007, 8:36 am
United States v. [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 8:31 am
In Salas v. [read post]
15 Jun 2015, 8:00 am
Tyson Foods, Inc., ___ F.3d ___ (8th Cir. 2014), the plaintiffs sued their employer, Tyson, under the federal Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) and state law. [read post]
19 Sep 2021, 9:02 pm
Brnovich and Its Implications September 20, 2021 | Joshua Sellers, Arizona State University Sandra Day O’Connor College of Law The Supreme Court’s decision in Brnovich v. [read post]
6 Jan 2020, 3:13 pm
(Keeton v. [read post]
21 Feb 2023, 5:18 am
At the 2021 Supreme Court hearing in the Access Copyright v. [read post]
5 Aug 2009, 2:57 pm
The lawsuit, Douglas, et al. v. [read post]
4 Nov 2009, 4:12 am
Premium Mortgage Corp. v. [read post]
31 Aug 2012, 10:04 am
Today, the Supreme Court granted a petition that asks whether the named plaintiff in a class action filed in state court can prevent removal of the case to federal court under the Class Action Fairness Act of 2005 (CAFA) by filing with the complaint a “stipulation” that states that the class will not damages of less than $5 million—the threshold for federal jurisdiction under CAFA.In the case before the Court, Standard Fire Insurance Co. v. [read post]
