Search for: "Fed Ex" Results 1021 - 1040 of 2,365
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Nov 2013, 6:38 am by David Markus
The feds should know better, but they generally ignore Rule No. 1," Markus said. [read post]
26 Nov 2013, 5:09 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Safari Water Filtration Sys., Inc., 381 F.3d 1111, 1119 (Fed. [read post]
25 Nov 2013, 9:00 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
Cir. 2004); see also Ex parte Nehls, 88 USPQ2d 1883, 1887-89 (BPAI 2008) (precedential) and Ex parte Curry, 84 USPQ2d 1272 (BPAI 2005), aff’d (Fed. [read post]
19 Nov 2013, 4:44 am by Dennis Crouch
Retail Decisions, Inc., 654 F.3d 1366, 1375 (Fed. [read post]
12 Nov 2013, 11:22 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Wang, 202 F.3d 1340, 1349 n.8 (Fed. [read post]
11 Nov 2013, 9:17 pm by Kevin LaCroix
 Their question whether they could have the painting shipped via UPS or Fed Ex drew a blank look and an uncertain shrug from the proprietor, so in the time-honored tradition of Americans overseas, the American gentleman raised his voice and said with great care “WE (pause) WANT (pause) TO (pause) SHIP (pause) IT (pause) TO (pause) A-MER-I-CA. [read post]
10 Nov 2013, 1:23 pm by Jake McGowan
Cheryl Saunders came into court with a made up letter from Fed Ex stating that ‘Constance Walsh opened the package and saw what was in it and gave it back to Fed Ex. [read post]
8 Nov 2013, 9:48 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Also possibly an experimental use exception, though it’s construed too narrowly to help almost anyone now: Fed. [read post]
6 Nov 2013, 1:54 pm
If the state gets an adverse decision they just send some cops or feds into chambers: "Judge, you didn't hear the whole story in open court. [read post]
6 Nov 2013, 7:10 am
Now, there is a problem with the feds taking over this prosecution, and that should be the focus of the story about this case. [read post]
29 Oct 2013, 6:46 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
” In re Zletz, 893 F.2d 319, 321 (Fed. [read post]
29 Oct 2013, 6:41 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
See In re Morris, 127 F.3d 1048, 1054 (Fed. [read post]
25 Oct 2013, 6:02 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Apotex, Inc., 480 F.3d 1348, 1369-70 (Fed. [read post]
25 Oct 2013, 5:57 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
”In re Zletz, 893 F.2d 319, 321(Fed. [read post]
23 Oct 2013, 12:37 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
Ex parte BIENIOSEK As to 112 rejections:Rejection under 35 U.S.C. [read post]